ArticleSpine surgery and related research2025
Does Somatosensory-Evoked Potential Simultaneously Decrease with Transcranial Motor-Evoked Potential Alarm? A Multicenter Study by the Monitoring Committee of the Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research.
Article in Spine surgery and related research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
28 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Multimodal intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM)-such as monitoring muscle-evoked potentials after transcranial electrical stimulation (Tc-MEP) with somatosensory-evoked potential (SEP) after electrical stimulation of the peripheral nerve-is recommended in spine surgeries to prevent iatrogenic neurological complications. However, the effect of using Tc-MEP with SEP to protect against neurological complications, particularly motor function, remains unknown. In clinical settings, changes due to Tc-MEP meeting the alarm points must be a potential neurological injury. This retrospective study, focusing on true-positive (TP) cases, aimed to clarify the change in the SEP waveform simultaneously with the Tc-MEP alarm. Methods: We included 68 patients with TP who had Tc-MEP changes and new postoperative motor weakness at more than one level of the manual muscle test after surgery. We compared the cases based on the category of spine surgery and paralysis type. We evaluated sex, age at spine surgery (high- or non high-risk), and paralysis type (segmental, long tract, or both). We defined the alarm points as follows: >70% decrease in Tc-MEP wave amplitudes, >50% decrease in wave amplitudes, or 10% extension of SEP latency. Next, we evaluated the SEP wave changes with a Tc-MEP alarm. Results: All patients showed progressive motor weakness after surgery, and 21 patients (31%) showed SEP changes at the same time as the Tc-MEP alarm. There were no statistically significant differences in the ratio of SEP change between the two groups according to the spine surgery category or among the three groups according to the paralysis type. Conclusions: Multimodal IONM is an important tool. However, the SEP changes do not necessarily appear immediately after the Tc-MEP alarm. Spine surgeons should appropriately treat Tc-MEP alarms to preserve motor function, regardless of SEP changes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.