ArticleSpine surgery and related research2025
Safety of Continuous Low-Dose Aspirin Therapy for Lumbar Decompression Alone.
Article in Spine surgery and related research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Perioperative antiplatelet management in CAD patients undergoing spinal fusion: balancing cardiovascular safety and bleeding risk.American journal of translational research · 2026Article
- Perioperative antithrombotic management in degenerative spine surgery: a multicenter cohort of 767 consecutive patients.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Safety in Spine Surgery: Risk Factors for Intraoperative Blood Loss and Management Strategies.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Whether the benefits of continued perioperative aspirin therapy in spinal surgery outweigh the risk of perioperative complications remains unclear. This study evaluates the perioperative effects of continuous low-dose aspirin treatment in patients who underwent lumbar decompression alone. Methods: This single-institute retrospective study included patients who underwent lumbar decompression for L1/2-L5/S1 lesions. The patient characteristics, perioperative parameters, and complications were compared between 103 patients who continued to take 100 mg/day aspirin during the perioperative period (aspirin group) and 653 patients who did not take antiplatelet or anticoagulant drugs (nonaspirin group). Results: A significantly higher proportion of the patients in the aspirin group were males. The patients in the aspirin group had significantly lower preoperative hemoglobin levels than those in the non-aspirin group (P=0.001 and P=0.044, respectively). No significant differences were detected between the groups in terms of the number of disc decompression levels, duration of surgery, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage volume, number of reoperations required for epidural hematoma formation, or perioperative blood transfusions. No cardiovascular or cerebrovascular ischemic events occurred in either group. Conclusions: Continuous low-dose aspirin therapy alone during the perioperative period for lumbar decompression did not increase perioperative bleeding or the risk of bleeding-related complications. In conclusion, continuous low-dose aspirin treatment may be acceptable for use in preventing the increased risk of cardiovascular disease caused by aspirin withdrawal in patients undergoing lumbar decompression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.