ArticleSpine surgery and related research2025
New Patient PROMIS Scores of Patients Presenting with Low Back Pain Predict Time to Elective Spine Surgery.
Article in Spine surgery and related research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This study aims to determine whether Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) domain scores can predict elective spine surgery within 1 year of initial clinic evaluation. Methods: A retrospective query for all new patient spine clinic visits with diagnosis codes related to lower back pain was carried out at a single academic institution. A chart review was conducted to collect sociodemographic variables, clinic visit details, and PROMIS domain scores (PF [Physical Function], PI [Pain Interference], Depression, and Global Health-Physical and Global Health-Mental). Patients were divided into Surgery and No Surgery, and for time to surgery, a subanalysis was also carried out. Results: Overall, 116 (8.4%) of 1,387 new patients underwent surgery within 1 year. Race, Surgeon vs. Advanced Practice Provider (APP), and whether advanced imaging (MRI or CT myelogram) was available for interpretation were statistically associated with undergoing surgery. Patients in the Surgery group had statistically significant worse PROMIS scores in all domains when compared with the No Surgery group, and PROMIS PI was additionally associated with Time to Surgery. Multivariate analysis identified PROMIS PI, race, presence of advanced imaging interpretation, and Surgeon vs. APP as independent predictors of Surgery vs. No Surgery; however, only race and PROMIS PI were independent predictors of Time to Surgery. Conclusions: Worse new patient PROMIS PI scores were associated with undergoing surgery within one year of initial evaluation. To determine if PROMIS scores may help in a triage capacity to identify which patients are most appropriate for a surgeon visit versus a nonsurgical provider, further research is needed, thereby improving the efficiency of surgical care delivery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.