ArticleSpine surgery and related research2025
Characteristics of Poor Recordability of Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring during Metastatic Spinal Tumor Surgery: A Multicenter Study.
Article in Spine surgery and related research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
27 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The objective of this study is to investigate the poor recordability characteristics of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) for metastatic spinal tumors, focusing on tumor status or preoperative muscle weakness. Methods: A total of 132 patients (age 65.3±11.8 years; 82 men) with or without preoperative lower extremity muscle weakness were included in this study. The patients' background characteristics, the presence and degree of pre- and postoperative muscle weakness, and the IONM outcome, including the availability of transcranial motor evoked potential (Tc-MEP) recording and the occurrence of Tc-MEP alarms, were investigated. The data between the groups with and without preoperative muscle weakness were compared. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the risk factors for unrecordable Tc-MEP. Results: Sixty-seven patients with muscle weakness had significantly more unrecordable Tc-MEP (19% vs. 5%, p=0.009) than the 65 patients without muscle weakness. The highest percentage of recordable Tc-MEP in the group with muscle weakness was noted in the plantar muscle (72%). Multivariate analysis identified manual muscle test (MMT) score of ≤3 (odds ratio [OR] 4.529) and ventral spinal cord compression by metastatic tumor (OR 3.924) as independent significant factors for unrecordable Tc-MEP. Conclusions: IONM for metastatic spinal cord tumors with muscle weakness had a high rate of unrecordable Tc-MEP. Additionally, Tc-MEP may not be detectable in cases of ventral spinal cord compression by a tumor; therefore, preoperative imaging should be thoroughly evaluated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.