ArticleSpine surgery and related research2025
Removal versus Retention of Posterior Spinal Implants in Patients with Healed Thoracolumbar Fractures: Analysis of Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes-A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Article in Spine surgery and related research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: There is ongoing debate over whether to remove or retain posterior spinal implants following the successful union of thoracolumbar fractures. This study aimed to compare clinical and radiographic outcomes following removal versus retention of posterior spinal implants in patients with healed thoracolumbar fractures. Methods: All patients who underwent posterior short segment fixation for thoracolumbar (T11-L2) fractures and presented to the outpatient clinic of our institution (level I trauma center) from October 2020 to October 2022 were enrolled in the study. The participants were randomly assigned to one of the two groups. The EQ-5D-5L was the primary outcome of the study. The secondary outcomes were the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), loss of correction, and incidence of complications. Results: A total of 52 patients were included in the final analysis with 26 patients in each group. During the 6-month and 1-year follow-up visits, the implant removal group had a statistically significant improvement in the EQ-Index, EQ-VAS, and ODI, while there were no significant differences in these parameters in the implant retention group. There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding loss of correction ( Conclusions: In patients who have undergone posterior instrumentation for thoracolumbar fractures, the removal of implants following fracture consolidation demonstrates enhanced clinical outcomes when compared to retaining the implants. Although loss of correction is marginally higher in the implant removal group than in the retention group, this disparity did not attain statistical significance, nor did it correlate with inferior clinical outcomes. Furthermore, the incidence of complications following implant removal remained minimal. These findings emphasize the favorable efficacy and safety profile of implant removal procedures within this patient population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.