ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2025
A multi-step completion process model of cell plasticity.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Plasticity is the potential for cells or cell populations to change their phenotypes and behaviors in response to internal or external cues. Plasticity is fundamental to many complex biological processes, yet to date there remains a lack of mathematical models that can elucidate and predict molecular behaviors in a plasticity program. Here, we report a new mathematical framework that models cell plasticity as a multi-step completion process, where the system moves from the initial state along a path guided by multiple intermediate attractors until the final state (i.e. a new homeostasis) is reached. Using omics time-series data as model input, we show that our method fits data well; identifies attractor states by their timing and molecular markers which are well-aligned with domain knowledge; and can make quantitative and time-resolved predictions such as the molecular outcomes of blocking a plasticity program from reaching completion, to an R2 of 0.53-0.63. We demonstrate that application of our model to primary patient-derived data can provide quantitative insights and predictions that may be useful in guiding further research and potential biomedical interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.