ReviewWiley interdisciplinary reviews. RNA
Advances in Detection Methods for A-to-I RNA Editing.
Review in Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. RNA. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The context-dependent role of the dsRNA response in linking A-to-I editing and ADAR to normal hematopoiesis and leukemia.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- RNA editing signatures and codon adaptation reveal potential translational compatibility between Hendra virus and its natural host Pteropus Alecto.Archives of microbiology · 2025Article
- Experimental and Computational Tools for Mapping Circular RNA Modifications.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. RNAReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Adenosine-to-inosine (A-to-I) RNA editing is a key post-transcriptional modification that influences gene expression and various cellular processes. Advances in sequencing technologies have greatly contributed to the identification of A-to-I editing sites, providing insights into their distribution across coding and non-coding regions. These developments have facilitated the discovery of functionally relevant editing events and have advanced the understanding of their biological roles. This review presents the evolution of methodologies for RNA editing detection and examines recent advances, including chemically-assisted, enzyme-assisted, and quantitative approaches. By evaluating these techniques, we aim to help researchers select the most effective tools for investigating RNA editing and its broader implications in health and disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.