ReviewACS biomaterials science & engineering2025
In Situ Cancer Vaccines: Redefining Immune Activation in the Tumor Microenvironment.
Review in ACS biomaterials science & engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Molecular origin, discovery, validation and application of neoantigens.Asian journal of pharmaceutical sciences · 2026Review
- Genomic innovations in cancer prevention, diagnosis, prognosis and precision therapeutics.Frontiers in genetics · 2026Review
- Nanosystem-Mediated Phototherapy (PDT/PTT) - Chemodynamic Therapy for Synergistic Antitumor Therapy: Strategies and Advances.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- The interplay between oncolytic viruses, Toll-like receptor signaling, and chemotherapy in overcoming tumor immune tolerance.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cancer is one of the leading causes of mortality worldwide. Nanomedicines have significantly improved life expectancy and survival rates for cancer patients in current standard care. However, recurrence of cancer due to metastasis remains a significant challenge. Vaccines can provide long-term protection and are ideal for preventing bacterial and viral infections. Cancer vaccines, however, have shown limited therapeutic efficacy and raised safety concerns despite extensive research. Cancer vaccines target and stimulate responses against tumor-specific antigens and have demonstrated great potential for cancer treatment in preclinical studies. However, tumor-associated immunosuppression and immune tolerance driven by immunoediting pose significant challenges for vaccine design. In situ vaccination represents an alternative approach to traditional cancer vaccines. This strategy involves the intratumoral administration of immunostimulants to modulate the growth and differentiation of innate immune cells, such as dendritic cells, macrophages, and neutrophils, and restore T-cell activity. Currently approved in situ vaccines, such as T-VEC, have demonstrated clinical promise, while ongoing clinical trials continue to explore novel strategies for broader efficacy. Despite these advancements, failures in vaccine research highlight the need to address tumor-associated immune suppression and immune escape mechanisms. In situ vaccination strategies combine innate and adaptive immune stimulation, leveraging tumor-associated antigens to activate dendritic cells and cross-prime CD8+ T cells. Various vaccine modalities, such as nucleotide-based vaccines (e.g., RNA and DNA vaccines), peptide-based vaccines, and cell-based vaccines (including dendritic, T-cell, and B-cell approaches), show significant potential. Plant-based viral approaches, including cowpea mosaic virus and Newcastle disease virus, further expand the toolkit for in situ vaccination. Therapeutic modalities such as chemotherapy, radiation, photodynamic therapy, photothermal therapy, and Checkpoint blockade inhibitors contribute to enhanced antigen presentation and immune activation. Adjuvants like CpG-ODN and PRR agonists further enhance immune modulation and vaccine efficacy. The advantages of in situ vaccination include patient specificity, personalization, minimized antigen immune escape, and reduced logistical costs. However, significant barriers such as tumor heterogeneity, immune evasion, and logistical challenges remain. This review explores strategies for developing potent cancer vaccines, examines ongoing clinical trials, evaluates immune stimulation methods, and discusses prospects for advancing in situ cancer vaccination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.