ReviewCirculation. Heart failure2025
Gaps and Knowledge in the Contemporary Management of Acute Right Ventricular Failure.
Review in Circulation. Heart failure, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The quantitative haemodynamic effect of levosimendan, dobutamine, and milrinone in heart failure patients: a meta-analysis.ESC heart failure · 2026Pooled it
- Optimal haemodynamic status and prognostic predictors in patients with right ventricular dysfunction: the RIGHT study.Open heart · 2026Article
- Comprehensive Understanding and Diagnostic Approaches to Acute Right Ventricular Failure in the CCU.International journal of heart failure · 2026Article
- Right Ventricular Function in Patients With Significant Tricuspid Regurgitation.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Bridging the Gap: Exploring Right Ventricular-Pulmonary Artery Coupling in Acute Coronary syndrome-A Pilot Study.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute right ventricular failure (ARVF) is commonly seen in the intensive care unit and constitutes a significant clinical challenge, with associated high in-hospital mortality. Recently, the treatment of ARVF has significantly changed, with the progressive implementation of mechanical circulatory support devices that now represent important tools for clinicians in treating this condition. However, despite recent advancements, the optimal approach for ARVF remains elusive, and precise treatment algorithms and comprehensive management protocols are still lacking. In the present review, we explore the pathophysiology of ARVF, highlighting the different mechanisms that may lead to this clinical entity and emphasizing the left and right heart's complex interplay. We analyze the different therapeutic options that are now available for short- and long-term management of ARVF, with a particular focus on the advantages and disadvantages of the mechanical circulatory support devices actually used. Furthermore, we propose future directions in the field and a possible flowchart for the treatment of this condition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.