Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40223508›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of technology assessment in health care2025

Learning strategies for laypeople to participate in health technology assessment: a scoping review.

Alex Itaborahy, Quenia Morais, Leny Frossard, Iandy Mateus, Bianca Leite, Marisa Santos

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of technology assessment in health care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alex ItaborahyInstituto Nacional de Cardiologia, Núcleo de Avaliação de Tecnologias em Saúde, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3068-2087
Quenia MoraisInstituto Nacional de Cardiologia, Núcleo de Avaliação de Tecnologias em Saúde, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7657-7231
Leny FrossardInstituto Nacional de Cardiologia, Núcleo de Avaliação de Tecnologias em Saúde, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-7258-5682
Iandy MateusInstituto Nacional de Cardiologia, Núcleo de Avaliação de Tecnologias em Saúde, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-0992-9284
Bianca LeiteInstituto Nacional de Cardiologia, Núcleo de Avaliação de Tecnologias em Saúde, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4938-4434
Marisa SantosInstituto Nacional de Cardiologia, Núcleo de Avaliação de Tecnologias em Saúde, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2174-6800

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 400105/2022-5
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo provide an overview of learning strategies that health technology assessment (HTA) agencies use worldwide to educate laypeople about HTA.

methodsA scoping review focused on learning strategies to educate laypeople about HTA using the Joanna Briggs Institute frameworks was conducted across databases and gray literature. The study reviewed qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods studies from four databases, including practice documents from the HTA and health organization websites.

resultsFifteen studies were included in this review. The United Kingdom, Spain, and Canada mainly contributed to knowledge about educating laypeople in HTA. The main strategies employed were conference-like events, educational materials, training, and plain language. International HTA and health agencies developed courses, online training, and guidance materials to increase laypeople's participation in the HTA process.

conclusionsEfforts to improve public involvement in HTA focus on structured consultations, digital platforms, and capacity-building to enhance accessibility. Strategies like workshops and plain language aim to encourage lay participation, but challenges such as technical complexity and limited resources persist. Despite these challenges, incorporating patient perspectives has increased research relevance and public trust. Future studies should examine standardized frameworks for involvement, the impact of lay participation on policy, and solutions to barriers to a more equitable HTA process.

Indexed as

Community ParticipationLearningTechnology Assessment, BiomedicalHumanseducationhealth technology assessmentHTAlaypeopletraining

Identifiers

PMID40223508
PMCPMC12086598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.