Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40223289›Full record

ArticleAustralian occupational therapy journal2025

Changes in lifespace and participation in community-based occupations of people with acquired brain injury: A mixed methods exploration 6 months following occupational therapy driving assessment.

Louise Bassingthwaighte, Louise Gustafsson, Matthew Molineux

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Australian occupational therapy journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Louise BassingthwaighteDiscipline of Occupational Therapy, School of Health Sciences and Social Work, Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8847-8671
Louise GustafssonDiscipline of Occupational Therapy, School of Health Sciences and Social Work, Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5232-0987
Matthew MolineuxSchool of Health Sciences and Social Work, Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6671-4140

Funding

Metro South Health Research Support Scheme RSS_2020_013The Hopkins Centre
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionChanges arising from acquired brain injury may influence how individuals engage in valued community-based occupations such as driving. 'Lifespace' describes the area within which a person lives their life and represents opportunity for participation in out-of-home occupations. This study explored lifespace trajectory from pre- to 6 months post-occupational therapy driver assessment, to understand how, why, where, and with whom access and participation in community-based occupations is influenced by assessment outcome.

methodsAdults with acquired brain injury referred for occupational therapy driver assessment were recruited to the mixed methods study involving a travel diary, lifespace assessment, and semi-structured interviews. Qualitative analysis was guided by interpretive description. CONSUMER AND COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT: No consumer and community involvement

resultsOverall, 38 participants (55.3% male) aged 26 to 65 years reported increased lifespace 6 months following the conduct of an occupational therapy driver assessment. There was increased engagement in leisure pursuits (175%), work (23%), and social participation (21%) with reduced participation in health management (-50%) and instrumental activities of daily living (-15.4%) occupations post-OTDA. However, lifespace was significantly related to driver status, with those who had returned to driving more likely to access their community with greater frequency and less support (p < 0.001). Non-drivers experienced a deteriorating restricted lifespace. Analysis of semi-structured interviews (n = 12) created three broad themes that largely differed according to driver status: (i) 'Being me'-reconstructing occupational identity, (ii) opportunities for participation and the influence of choice, and (iii) 'Having connection' and impacts on wellbeing.

conclusionDriver status influences the trajectory of lifespace following participation in an occupational therapy driver assessment after acquired brain injury. Drivers experienced increased lifespace with greater opportunities to control engagement in community-based occupations with flexibility and spontaneity. Non-drivers reported diminished lifespace and occupational participation trajectories and require further support to facilitate occupational adaptation to increase opportunities for engagement in away-from-home occupations. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: After an acquired brain injury (ABI), many people find it harder to go out and do activities away from home. A common change is losing the ability to drive. An occupational therapy driver assessment (OTDA) checks if someone is ready to drive again. This study looked at how getting back to driving, or not, affected involvement in community activities. People who returned to driving reported doing more activities, more often, and with less help. They spent more time on leisure, work, and social activities. Those who did not drive went out less, visited fewer places, and relied more on others. When they did go out, it was mostly for essential tasks like shopping and health appointments. For those not able to drive, extra services and supports are needed to help build skills. This is the first study to look at how driving is connected to taking part in community activities after a brain injury. More research is needed to confirm findings.

Indexed as

Automobile DrivingBrain InjuriesOccupational TherapySocial ParticipationActivities of Daily LivingAdultAgedFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicLeisure ActivitiesMaleMiddle AgedQualitative Researchacquired brain injurycommunity participationlifespaceoccupationoccupational choiceoccupational identityoccupational therapy driver assessment

Identifiers

PMID40223289
PMCPMC11994898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.