Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40223146›Full record

ReviewPhilosophy, ethics, and humanities in medicine : PEHM2025

Unveiling the shadows: obstacles, consequences, and challenges of information opacity in healthcare systems.

Majid Alizadeh, Nazila Azizi, Samireh Mahdavi, Fouad Baghlani

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophy, ethics, and humanities in medicine : PEHM, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Nigeria needs a publicly accessible medical register.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Majid AlizadehStudent Research Committee, School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Islamic Republic of Iran. majid.128.am@gmail.com.
Nazila AziziStudent Research Committee, School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Islamic Republic of Iran.
Samireh MahdaviAbadan University of Medical Sciences, Abadan, Islamic Republic of Iran.
Fouad BaghlaniAbadan University of Medical Sciences, Abadan, Islamic Republic of Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionInformation transparency in healthcare systems is critical for ensuring public trust, enhancing service quality, and reducing costs. However, many countries face significant challenges concerning information opacity, which leads to inequality, discrimination, and increased risks for patients and healthcare providers. This study aims to explore the obstacles, consequences, and challenges of information opacity in healthcare systems, along with proposing solutions for improvement.

methodThis review synthesized findings from scientific literature, including articles, reports, and governmental sources, to investigate how the lack of information transparency affects healthcare performance and public trust. A comprehensive search was conducted across major databases such as PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar, utilizing relevant keywords. Selection criteria focused on the relevance, quality, and timeliness of the sources, leading to a critical analysis of the extracted data through thematic synthesis.

findingsThe study identifies several key consequences of information opacity, including a decrease in public trust, reduced service quality, increased corruption, and heightened healthcare costs. The findings align with existing literature that highlights the importance of transparency for effective decision-making and accountability in healthcare systems. Furthermore, obstacles to achieving transparency were identified, such as difficulties in accessing necessary information, privacy concerns, commercial interests, and the need for systemic reforms in healthcare financing. DISCUSSION: The implications of this study underscore the necessity for clear policies and procedures regarding information dissemination in healthcare. The proposed framework for improving transparency includes establishing robust communication channels, enhancing public access to information, fostering a culture of accountability, and leveraging emerging technologies like blockchain and artificial intelligence. Addressing these challenges is essential for building trust and improving healthcare outcomes.

conclusionEnhancing information transparency within healthcare systems is vital for improving public trust and service quality. This study provides a foundational framework for policymakers to implement necessary changes, promoting a more equitable and efficient healthcare environment. Future research should focus on evaluating the effectiveness of these proposed measures in diverse healthcare contexts, particularly by integrating theoretical frameworks such as stakeholder theory and institutional theory.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareInformation DisseminationHumansTrustChallengesConsequencesHealth systemInformation transparency

Identifiers

PMID40223146
PMCPMC11995619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.