ReviewPhilosophy, ethics, and humanities in medicine : PEHM2025
Unveiling the shadows: obstacles, consequences, and challenges of information opacity in healthcare systems.
Review in Philosophy, ethics, and humanities in medicine : PEHM, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Causes and Consequences of Lack of Transparency In Iran's Healthcare System: A Qualitative Interview Study.Developing world bioethics · 2026Article
- The Relationship Between COVID-19 Vaccine Regret, Distrust of the Healthcare System, and Future Vaccine Intentions.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2026Article
- Disintegrating ipseity: a gerontological exegesis of Alzheimer's disease and relational identity in Alice Munro's fiction.Philosophy, ethics, and humanities in medicine : PEHM · 2026Article
- Whose voice counts? Public participation as a legal and commercial determinant of health in South Africa.BMJ global health · 2026Article
- Leveraging AI solutions for sustainable practice in pediatric radiology: a practical guide and an educational tool.Pediatric radiology · 2026Review
- Nigeria needs a publicly accessible medical register.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Article
- Barriers to the Implementation of Iran's Clean Air Act: A Policy-Oriented Scoping Review.Environmental health insights · 2026Review
- Healthcare Decision-Making Ecosystem Deengineering.Cureus · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionInformation transparency in healthcare systems is critical for ensuring public trust, enhancing service quality, and reducing costs. However, many countries face significant challenges concerning information opacity, which leads to inequality, discrimination, and increased risks for patients and healthcare providers. This study aims to explore the obstacles, consequences, and challenges of information opacity in healthcare systems, along with proposing solutions for improvement.
methodThis review synthesized findings from scientific literature, including articles, reports, and governmental sources, to investigate how the lack of information transparency affects healthcare performance and public trust. A comprehensive search was conducted across major databases such as PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar, utilizing relevant keywords. Selection criteria focused on the relevance, quality, and timeliness of the sources, leading to a critical analysis of the extracted data through thematic synthesis.
findingsThe study identifies several key consequences of information opacity, including a decrease in public trust, reduced service quality, increased corruption, and heightened healthcare costs. The findings align with existing literature that highlights the importance of transparency for effective decision-making and accountability in healthcare systems. Furthermore, obstacles to achieving transparency were identified, such as difficulties in accessing necessary information, privacy concerns, commercial interests, and the need for systemic reforms in healthcare financing. DISCUSSION: The implications of this study underscore the necessity for clear policies and procedures regarding information dissemination in healthcare. The proposed framework for improving transparency includes establishing robust communication channels, enhancing public access to information, fostering a culture of accountability, and leveraging emerging technologies like blockchain and artificial intelligence. Addressing these challenges is essential for building trust and improving healthcare outcomes.
conclusionEnhancing information transparency within healthcare systems is vital for improving public trust and service quality. This study provides a foundational framework for policymakers to implement necessary changes, promoting a more equitable and efficient healthcare environment. Future research should focus on evaluating the effectiveness of these proposed measures in diverse healthcare contexts, particularly by integrating theoretical frameworks such as stakeholder theory and institutional theory.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.