Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40223126›Full record

ArticleAnnals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials2025

Activity of imipenem/relebactam against KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae and the possible role of Ompk36 mutation in determining resistance: an Italian retrospective analysis.

Emanuele Palomba, Agnese Comelli, Francesca Saluzzo, Federico Di Marco, Elisa Matarazzo, Noemi Lo Re, Alessandra Bielli, Chiara Silvia Vismara, Antonio Muscatello, Marianna Rossi and 3 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Targeting KPC-ProducingMicroorganisms · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. mSphere · 2026
    Article
  4. Harnessing interpretable deep learning to predict resistance inFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Observational
  9. Review
  10. Characterization of genetic context ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Emanuele PalombaDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Luigi Sacco Hospital, Via G.B. Grassi 74, 20157, Milan, Italy. palomba.emanuele@asst-fbf-sacco.it.
Agnese ComelliInfectious Diseases Unit, Foundation IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Francesca SaluzzoIRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Federico Di MarcoIRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Elisa MatarazzoClinical Microbiology Unit, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy.
Noemi Lo ReClinical Microbiology Unit, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy.
Alessandra BielliClinical Microbiology Unit, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy.
Chiara Silvia VismaraClinical Microbiology Unit, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy.
Antonio MuscatelloInfectious Diseases Unit, Foundation IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Marianna RossiInfectious Diseases Unit, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, Monza, Italy.
Daniela Maria CirilloIRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Alessandra BanderaInfectious Diseases Unit, Foundation IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Andrea GoriDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Luigi Sacco Hospital, Via G.B. Grassi 74, 20157, Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAntimicrobial resistance in Enterobacterales represents a substantial threat in modern clinical practice and the collection of data on the efficacy of new molecules is of paramount importance. Our study aimed to analyse the in vitro activity of imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam (IMI/REL) against KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (KPC-Kp) and investigate the genetic determinants of resistance to this agent.

methodsA total of 603 KPC-Kp strains, which were randomly collected during a multicentre study in northern Italy in the period 2016-2018, were analysed retrospectively. Antibiotic susceptibility testing was performed using a commercial broth microdilution. IMI-REL-resistant KPC-Kp strains were further analysed by whole genome sequencing to identify resistance determinants.

resultsNinety-eight percent of KPC-Kp (591/603) showed in vitro susceptibility to IMI/REL, with a minimum inhibitory concentration below the EUCAST cut-off. Different mutations in OmpK36 were found in all 12 IMI/REL-resistant strains, which belonged to MLST STs 258 (3 isolates), 307 (8 isolates) and 512 (1 isolate), but no clonal relatedness was detected by the minimum spanning tree analysis, except for 2 strains isolated in the same hospital. Equal distribution of bla

conclusionsIMI/REL showed good in vitro activity against the KPC-Kp strains analysed. All the IMI/REL-resistant strains displayed a mutation in porin OmpK36 and produced carbapenemases, with KPC-2 and KPC-3 being equally distributed. MVB and CZA maintained good activity against IMI/REL resistant isolates.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsAzabicyclo CompoundsBacterial ProteinsDrug Resistance, BacterialImipenemKlebsiella pneumoniaePorinsbeta-LactamasesDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialHumansItalyKlebsiella InfectionsMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMutationRetrospective StudiesWhole Genome SequencingAnti-Bacterial AgentsAzabicyclo CompoundsBacterial Proteinsbeta-LactamasesImipenemOmpK36 protein, Klebsiella pneumoniaePorinsrelebactamCarbapenem-resistantImipenem/relebactamKlebsiella pneumoniaeKPC

Identifiers

PMID40223126
PMCPMC11995579

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.