ArticleBMC pediatrics2025
Clinical data required for the approval of pediatric pharmaceuticals in Japan.
Article in BMC pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A White Paper on Advancing Long-Acting Therapeutics for Maternal and Pediatric Health by Bridging Gaps in Clinical Research, Access and Regulation.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026Review
- Transition from drug lag to drug loss in pediatric oncology: a comprehensive evaluation of the Japan-U.S. approval gap.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn Japan, the number of pharmaceuticals with pediatric indications is low, and some are approved only in Europe or the USA but not in Japan. As the approval review report by the Japanese health authority contains any detailed items considered for drug approval, this study aimed to analyze the review reports and elucidate data types that facilitate the approval of pediatric drugs in Japan.
methodsWe identified products approved in Japan, extracted relevant product- and review-related information, and summarized the characteristics of pediatric drug clinical data and drug approval procedures.
resultsAmong 625 products (approved 04/2019-02/2024), 171 with pediatric indications were analyzed. The approval review considered orphan drug designation for 56 products, public knowledge-based application for 16 products, mandatory post-marketing surveillance for 42 products, and investigator-initiated studies for 11 products. For only 10 products, confirmatory studies were completed exclusively in Japanese children. Among the other 161 products, extrapolation from non-Japanese children and Japanese adults and/or older children was discussed for 93 and 100 products, respectively. Extrapolation-based reviews focused on ethnic and population factors and consistency of exposure dose, efficacy, and safety. Statistical confirmation is not always necessary for approval. Administrative incentives are often applied, including for orphan drugs and Sakigake designation and public knowledge-based applications.
conclusionsThe appropriateness or sufficiency of the clinical data package can refer to the PMDA. By considering joining a multinational study and determining the required number of Japanese patients, a path toward the approval of pediatric drugs in Japan can be identified.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.