Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40223090›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science and biotechnology2025

Florfenicol-induced dysbiosis impairs intestinal homeostasis and host immune system in laying hens.

Keesun Yu, Inhwan Choi, Minseong Kim, Young Jin Pyung, Jin-Sun Lee, Youbin Choi, Sohyoung Won, Younghoon Kim, Byung-Chul Park, Seung Hyun Han and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science and biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Natural Products AgainstMicroorganisms · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Frontiers in immunology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Keesun Yu *Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, and Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826, Republic of Korea.
Inhwan Choi *Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, and Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826, Republic of Korea.
Minseong KimDepartment of Agricultural Biotechnology, and Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826, Republic of Korea.
Young Jin PyungDepartment of Agricultural Biotechnology, and Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826, Republic of Korea.
Jin-Sun LeeDepartment of Oral Microbiology and Immunology, and Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826, Republic of Korea.
Youbin ChoiDepartment of Agricultural Biotechnology, and Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826, Republic of Korea.
Sohyoung WonInterdisciplinary Program in Bioinformatics, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Younghoon KimDepartment of Agricultural Biotechnology, and Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826, Republic of Korea.
Byung-Chul ParkGraduate School of International Agricultural Technology and Institute of Green-Bio Science and Technology, Seoul National University, Pyeongchang-Gun, Gangwon-Do, 25354, Republic of Korea.
Seung Hyun HanDepartment of Oral Microbiology and Immunology, and Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826, Republic of Korea.
Tae Sub ParkGraduate School of International Agricultural Technology and Institute of Green-Bio Science and Technology, Seoul National University, Pyeongchang-Gun, Gangwon-Do, 25354, Republic of Korea.
Tina Sørensen DalgaardDepartment of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, Aarhus University, Tjele, Denmark.
Cheol-Heui YunDepartment of Agricultural Biotechnology, and Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826, Republic of Korea. cyun@snu.ac.kr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0041-2887

Funding

National Research Foundation (KR) RS-2023-00218476National Research Foundation (KR) RS-2024-00454619the BK21 FOUR Program (KR) Department of Agricultural Biotechnologythe BK21 FOUR Program (KR) Seoul National Universitythe Cooperative Research Program for Agriculture Science and Technology Development (KR) RS-2022-RD010165the Ministry of Health & Welfare (KR) RS-2022- KH128577
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite growing concerns about the adverse effects of antibiotics in farm animals, there has been little investigation of the effects of florfenicol in laying hens. This study examined the effect of florfenicol on the intestinal homeostasis, immune system, and pathogen susceptibility of laying hens.

resultsThe oral administration of florfenicol at field-relevant levels for 5 d resulted in a decrease in the gut microbiota genera Lactobacillus, Bacillus, and Bacteroides, indicating the development of intestinal dysbiosis. The dysbiosis led to decreased mRNA levels of key regulators peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPAR-γ) and hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α), compromising intestinal hypoxia. Intestinal homeostasis was also disrupted, with decreased expression of Occludin and Mucin 2 (Muc2) genes combined with increased gut epithelial permeability. The breakdown in intestinal homeostasis and immune function provided a favorable environment for opportunistic bacteria like avian pathogenic Escherichia coli (APEC), culminating in systemic infection. Immunologically, florfenicol treatment resulted in increased proportion and absolute number of MRC1L-B

conclusionThe uncontrolled and widespread use of florfenicol can negatively affect intestinal health in chickens. Specifically, florfenicol was found to impair intestinal homeostasis and immune function in laying hens, including by reducing butyrate levels, thereby increasing their susceptibility to systemic APEC infection. The development of strategies for mitigating the adverse effects of florfenicol on gut health and pathogen susceptibility in laying hens is therefore essential.

Indexed as

Antibiotics-induced dysbiosisAvian immunologyAvian pathogenic Escherichia coliGut homeostasisLaying henShort chain fatty acids

Identifiers

PMID40223090
PMCPMC11995664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.