Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40223078›Full record

ArticleBMC medicine2025

Comforting styles of serious illness conversations: a Swiss wide factorial survey study.

Robert Staeck, Carsten Sauer, Steven M Asch, Sofia C Zambrano

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Robert StaeckInstitute of Social and Preventive Medicine (ISPM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Carsten SauerFaculty of Sociology, University of Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Germany.
Steven M AschDepartment of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Sofia C ZambranoInstitute of Social and Preventive Medicine (ISPM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland. Sofia.zambrano@unibe.ch.

Funding

Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung PCEFP1_194177
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSerious illness conversations can cause discomfort in patients, potentially impeding their understanding and decision-making. Identifying ways in which physicians can reduce this discomfort may improve care. This study investigates which physician communication styles and characteristics individuals perceive as comforting in physician-patient serious illness conversations.

methodsWe conducted a nationwide online factorial survey in German, French, and Italian with 1572 Swiss participants from the public (51.4% women) aged 16 to 94. Each participant assessed 5 out of 1000 different vignettes describing a physician informing a cancer patient about their terminal prognosis. We systematically manipulated 11 attributes: physician's years of experience, physician sex, patient sex, patient age, prior relationship to physician, clarity of information, self-disclosure, physician taking time, recommendation, expression of sadness, and continuity of care. Participants evaluated their comfort level with the physician described in the vignettes. Multilevel models with random effects were used to analyze the impact of the dimensions on comfort.

resultsClarity of information (β = 2.13, p < 0.01), taking enough time (β = 2.00, p < 0.01), and continuity of care (β = 1.27, p < 0.01) were the strongest predictors of comfort. A prior physician-patient relationship significantly increased comfort, with a longer relationship being more comforting (p < 0.01). Physician self-disclosure (β = 0.40, p < 0.01) and expression of sadness (β = 0.46, p < 0.01; β = 0.58, p < 0.01) also increased comfort. Recommendations based on experience did not influence comfort but failing to provide reasons for recommendations decreased comfort (β = - 0.24, p < 0.01). Recommendations based on patient preference increased comfort (β = 0.30, p < 0.01). A limitation of this study is that the vignettes describe only fictitious situations and can thus be seen as oversimplifications.

conclusionsTaking time, providing clear information, and ensuring continuity of care are pivotal in enhancing comfort. Also relevant are the expression of sadness, physician self-disclosure, and a prior relationship with the patient.

Indexed as

CommunicationNeoplasmsPhysician-Patient RelationsAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesSwitzerlandYoung AdultComfortCommunicationEnd-of-lifePhysician–patient relationship

Identifiers

PMID40223078
PMCPMC11995521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.