Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40223058›Full record

ArticleBMC pediatrics2025

Family-centered care in neonatal and pediatric critical care units: a scoping review of interventions, barriers, and facilitators.

Bayan Aljawad, Shaima Ali Miraj, Furqan Alameri, Husam Alzayer

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Exploring Parent Carer Empowerment in Childhood Onset Disability: A Qualitative Study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bayan AljawadCollege of Health Sciences, Saudi Electronic University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. bayanaljawad@gmail.com.
Shaima Ali MirajCollege of Health Sciences, Saudi Electronic University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Furqan AlameriDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Alsafeer Surgical Hospital, Ministry of Health, Karbala, Iraq.
Husam AlzayerDepartment of Academic Affairs, Prince Mohammed Medical City, Sakakah, Aljouf, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe Family-Centered Care (FCC) model has been linked to improved clinical outcomes and family satisfaction. However, implementing this model can be challenging, especially in neonatal and pediatric critical care units. This review aims to map the literature on FCC in neonatal and pediatric critical care units, identify barriers and facilitators of effective interventions, and suggest a practical step-by-step approach for implementing FCC interventions.

methodsThis scoping review was guided by the PRISMA-ScR guidelines and followed the Arksey and O'Malley 5-step scoping review framework. We accessed the databases on the 28 th of April, 2024, and included all prospective and randomized controlled trials (RCT) implementing FCC interventions from PubMed and Web of Science databases. Data were organized, tabulated, and described narratively.

resultsOut of 1,577 potentially relevant citations after duplicate removal, 17 articles met our eligibility criteria (4 RCTs and 13 prospective studies). Nine of these studies were conducted in neonatal intensive care units (NICU) and eight in pediatric intensive care units (PICU). Three NICU interventions were single-type interventions, while six were part of comprehensive programs; in the PICU, seven were single-type interventions and one was part of a comprehensive program. All interventions incorporated elements of FCC principles (respect, information sharing, collaboration, and participation). Barriers included institutional factors, provider attitudes, cultural issues, communication challenges, environmental constraints, training needs, and emotional stress. FCC facilitators included enhanced environment, empowerment and training, supportive Infrastructure, collaborative communication, parental Involvement, adaptive interventions, and continuous feedback.

conclusionEffective implementation of FCC interventions requires careful planning and needs assessment. It ensures management support, regular staff training, family orientation, and a continuous feedback loop. Incorporating FCC principles and delivering culturally acceptable interventions is key while acknowledging possible barriers and utilizing available facilitators. FCC interventions can help foster a healthcare culture that values partnerships with families and can transform the neonatal and pediatric critical care experience for patients, families, and providers alike.

Indexed as

Critical CareIntensive Care Units, NeonatalIntensive Care Units, PediatricPatient-Centered CareChildHumansInfant, NewbornProfessional-Family RelationsBarrierFacilitatorFamily-centered careInterventionNicuPicu

Identifiers

PMID40223058
PMCPMC11995472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.