ArticleCancer cell international2025
Identification and validation of platinum resistance signature in gastric cancer.
Article in Cancer cell international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPlatinum was the first drug with proven activity against gastric cancer (GC), the combination with fluoropyrimidine is the standard first-line systemic therapy for patients of GC. However, a major cause of treatment failure still is the existence of drug resistance. The purpose of this study is to identify and validate the platinum-related genes in GC and to construct a multi-gene joint signature for predicting the prognosis of GC patients.
methodsBased on 326 platinum-related genes from GeneCards, GO and KEGG analysis were applied for differentially expressed genes in GC, UniCox regression analysis was used to select effective genes and Lasso-Cox regression was utilized to construct a prognosis model. Stratified analysis, CNV landscape, TMB and MSI status, HLA gene expression, GSEA and GSVA analysis, immune activities, immunotherapy sensitivities were evaluated in the resistant high and low groups. Drug resistant cell lines, PDO and PDX models were used to validate this signature.
resultsGO analysis of 140 differentially expressed genes were involved in many processes and KEGG pathways were enriched in platinum resistance and cancer. UniCox regression analysis was screened out 21 genes and conducted a platinum resistance scoring model. Stratified analysis indicated that the drug resistance score had a good predictive value in subgroups divided by T-stage, age and race. CNV changes were more occurred in the score-high group, and most model genes were negatively correlated with TMB, MSI and HLA gene expression. The immune score in resistant group was significantly higher, within more mast cell, regulatory T cell and dendritic cell infiltrated in. In vitro and in vivo models showed that 21 platinum resistance genes had varying degrees of upregulation under CDDP chemotherapy pressure.
conclusionsThe 21 gene-signature for platinum was developed to predict response to platinum chemotherapy for GC patients. It is worthwhile to further evaluate the molecular biology and the clinical applications of this signature.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.