Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40223045›Full record

ArticleBMC oral health2025

Sulfonated polyether ketone ketone (SPEKK) implant as an alternative to titanium implant-in vivo study on Wistar Albino rat mandible.

Bhavini Nahata, Subhabrata Maiti, Mohanraj Karthik Ganesh, Artak Heboyan, Lokesh Sai, Jessy Paulraj

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Bhavini NahataDepartment of Prosthodontics and Implantology, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, Tamilnadu, 600077, India.
Subhabrata MaitiDepartment of Prosthodontics and Implantology, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, Tamilnadu, 600077, India. drsubhoprostho@gmail.com.
Mohanraj Karthik GaneshBiomedical Research Unit and Lab Animal Centre (BRULAC), Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, Tamilnadu, 600077, India.
Artak HeboyanDepartment of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Stomatology, Yerevan State Medical University after Mkhitar Heratsi, Str. Koryun 2, Yerevan, 0025, Armenia. a_heboyan@farabi.tums.ac.ir.
Lokesh SaiDepartment of Prosthodontics and Implantology, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, Tamilnadu, 600077, India.
Jessy PaulrajDepartment of Pedodontics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTitanium is commonly used for dental implants due to its high biocompatibility and durability. However, concerns about metal ion release and aesthetic limitations in certain tissue biotypes have driven the search for alternative materials. Polyetherketoneketone (PEKK), a high-performance polymer, has emerged as a promising option due to its biomimetic properties. Surface modifications, such as treatment with sulfuric acid (H2SO4), may further enhance its osteogenic potential.

aimThe study aimed to evaluate the osteogenic efficacy of H2SO4-modified PEKK implants in comparison to titanium implants. METHODOLOGY: Three groups were assessed: Titanium, unmodified PEKK and H2SO4-modified PEKK(SPEKK). Surface characteristics were analyzed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Wettability was checked through contact angle evaluation. Cell viability was evaluated through MTT assays. Implants were placed in rat mandibles, and bone formation was analyzed after 6 weeks using nano-CT and histological assessments. Toxicity was as Statistical comparisons were performed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey's post-hoc test.

resultsAcid-modified PEKK implants exhibited the highest bone formation (280.09 ± 12.03) significantly outperforming Titanium (265.12 ± 11.08) and unmodified PEKK (266.52 ± 7.28) (p < 0.05).

conclusionsH2SO4-modified PEKK (SPEKK) implants demonstrated superior osteogenic properties compared to titanium, suggesting that these modified polymers could be viable alternatives for aesthetic implants.

Indexed as

Dental ImplantsKetonesMandiblePolyethylene GlycolsTitaniumAnimalsBenzophenonesBiocompatible MaterialsCell SurvivalMaleMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningOsteogenesisPolymersRatsRats, WistarSulfuric AcidsBenzophenonesBiocompatible MaterialsDental ImplantsKetonespolyetheretherketonepolyetherketoneketonePolyethylene GlycolsPolymerssulfuric acidSulfuric AcidsTitaniumAnimal studyOsseointegrationPEKKSulfonationSurface modification

Identifiers

PMID40223045
PMCPMC11995496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.