Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40223003›Full record

ArticlePlanta2025

Hormonal crosstalk during the reproductive stage of Coffea arabica: interactions among gibberellin, abscisic acid, and ethylene.

Lillian Magalhães Azevedo, Raphael Ricon de Oliveira, Gabriel Lasmar Dos Reis, Gabriel de Campos Rume, Joyce Pereira Alvarenga, Robert Márquez Gutiérrez, Júlia de Carvalho Costa, Antonio Chalfun-Junior

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Planta, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Genome-Wide Analysis of the GRF-GIF Module inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lillian Magalhães AzevedoLaboratory of Plant Molecular Physiology, Plant Physiology Sector, Institute of Biology, Federal University of Lavras (UFLA), Lavras, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Raphael Ricon de OliveiraLaboratory of Plant Molecular Physiology, Plant Physiology Sector, Institute of Biology, Federal University of Lavras (UFLA), Lavras, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Gabriel Lasmar Dos ReisLaboratory of Plant Molecular Physiology, Plant Physiology Sector, Institute of Biology, Federal University of Lavras (UFLA), Lavras, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Gabriel de Campos RumeLaboratory of Plant Molecular Physiology, Plant Physiology Sector, Institute of Biology, Federal University of Lavras (UFLA), Lavras, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Joyce Pereira AlvarengaLaboratory of Plant Molecular Physiology, Plant Physiology Sector, Institute of Biology, Federal University of Lavras (UFLA), Lavras, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Robert Márquez GutiérrezLaboratory of Plant Molecular Physiology, Plant Physiology Sector, Institute of Biology, Federal University of Lavras (UFLA), Lavras, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Júlia de Carvalho CostaLaboratory of Plant Molecular Physiology, Plant Physiology Sector, Institute of Biology, Federal University of Lavras (UFLA), Lavras, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Antonio Chalfun-JuniorLaboratory of Plant Molecular Physiology, Plant Physiology Sector, Institute of Biology, Federal University of Lavras (UFLA), Lavras, Minas Gerais, Brazil. chalfunjunior@ufla.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1794-9429

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 309005/2022-1Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 370434/2024-2Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico Project 465580/2014-9Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais APQ-03406-18Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais BPD-00840-22Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais CAP APQ 03605/17Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2021/06968-3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MAIN

conclusionThe application of gibberellin and abscisic acid in coffee plants resulted in increased floral bud formation and fruit production by regulating key genes involved in flowering and hormonal biosynthesis pathways. Despite ongoing efforts, understanding hormonal regulation in perennial and woody species with complex phenological cycles, such as Coffea arabica L., remains limited. Given the global importance of coffee, identifying the main regulators of reproductive development is crucial to guarantee production, especially in face of climate change. This study investigated the effects of gibberellin (GA) and abscisic acid (ABA) at different concentrations (5, 25 and 100 ppm) in the reproductive development of C. arabica. Phenological analyses, molecular identification of genes involved in GA and ABA biosynthesis, degradation, and signaling, as well as gene expression profiling in leaves and floral buds during floral induction and development, were conducted. Promoter analysis of CaFT, quantification of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate (ACC), enzymatic activity of ACC oxidase (ACO), and ethylene content were also assessed. Results showed that GA irrespective of concentration and ABA at 25 ppm applied during the main period of floral induction (March) significantly increased the number of floral buds, with ABA also accelerating the development. Similarly, applying these regulators in plants with floral buds at more advanced stages (August) increased the number of floral buds and fruit production in the GA (5 and 100 ppm) and ABA (25 and 100 ppm) treatments. Phylogenetic and molecular analyses identified genes related to GA and ABA biosynthesis, degradation, and signaling in coffee plants. GA and ABA treatments affected the expression of genes related to floral induction and organ formation, such as CaDELLA in March, which may relate to the increased number of floral buds. Moreover, in August, plants treated with 5 and 100 ppm GA and 100 ppm ABA showed up-regulation of CaFT1 expression, likely due to the down-regulation of CaCO during this period. In addition to GA-ABA interactions, our results suggest that GA promotes ACC accumulation in leaves in August, which may act as a mobile signal transported to floral buds, where its conversion to ethylene could regulate anthesis, highlighting a GA-ACC-ethylene interaction in coffee flowering. However, no significant differences in ethylene biosynthesis were observed in March with the application of these hormones, underscoring the incipient role of ethylene during floral induction in coffee. These results suggest reciprocal regulation of floral development by GA-ABA pathways in a dose-dependent manner and interacting with other hormonal pathways such as the ethylene biosynthesis in leaves and floral buds. These findings provide new insights into the hormonal regulation of coffee flowering, guiding field practices and breeding programs to maximize coffee production.

Indexed as

Abscisic AcidCoffeaEthylenesGibberellinsPlant Growth RegulatorsFlowersGene Expression Regulation, PlantPlant LeavesPlant ProteinsReproductionSignal TransductionAbscisic AcidethyleneEthylenesGibberellinsPlant Growth RegulatorsPlant ProteinsFloral bud developmentHormonesInduction of floweringRT-qPCR

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.