Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40222979›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

Self-organizing neuromorphic nanowire networks as stochastic dynamical systems.

Gianluca Milano, Fabio Michieletti, Davide Pilati, Carlo Ricciardi, Enrique Miranda

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gianluca MilanoAdvanced Materials Metrology and Life Sciences Division, INRiM (Istituto Nazionale di Ricerca Metrologica), Torino, Italy. g.milano@inrim.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1983-6516
Fabio MichielettiDepartment of Applied Science and Technology, Politecnico di Torino, C.so Duca degli Abruzzi 24, Torino, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-6425-8782
Davide PilatiAdvanced Materials Metrology and Life Sciences Division, INRiM (Istituto Nazionale di Ricerca Metrologica), Torino, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-4785-0537
Carlo RicciardiDepartment of Applied Science and Technology, Politecnico di Torino, C.so Duca degli Abruzzi 24, Torino, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4703-7949
Enrique MirandaDepartament d'Enginyeria Electrònica, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuromorphic computing aims to develop hardware platforms that emulate the effectiveness of our brain. In this context, brain-inspired self-organizing memristive networks have been demonstrated as promising physical substrates for in materia computing. However, understanding the connection between network dynamics and information processing capabilities in these systems still represents a challenge. In this work, we show that neuromorphic nanowire network behavior can be modeled as an Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process which holistically combines stimuli-dependent deterministic trajectories and stochastic effects. This unified modeling framework, able to describe main features of network dynamics including noise and jumps, enables the investigation and quantification of the roles played by deterministic and stochastic dynamics on computing capabilities of the system in the context of physical reservoir computing. These results pave the way for the development of physical computing paradigms exploiting deterministic and stochastic dynamics in the same hardware platform in a similar way to what our brain does.

Identifiers

PMID40222979
PMCPMC11994789

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.