ArticleScientific reports2025
An effectiveness assessment ensemble for transmission corridor mechanized construction schemes based on weighted itemset mining and factor criticality analysis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A reasonable assessment of overall effective levels, incorporating dimensions such as risks, durations, and costs, will be salutary for the rational planning and better selection of optional transmission corridor mechanized construction schemes. With this motivation, this paper establishes an ensemble to address the issue of effective level diagnoses, and thus the hidden patterns and regularities between scheme features and effective levels can be explored. Based on the complex characteristics of input data, the Pearson correlation coefficient is deployed to handle the multidimensional data from multiple sources, and K-means clustering is then employed to classify scheme indicators into classes. The Weighted Itemset Mining (W-IM) model is proposed to identify the underlying key factors, to cope with the frequent omission of High Impact Low Probability (HILP) factors during the qualitative analysis stage. Next, the Factor Criticality Analysis (FCA) model is built to quantify the specific impact levels of these distinguished key elements. Finally, the significance proportion of individual features to the overall effectiveness can be determined and optimized according to the Entropy Impact Model (EIM) model. An empirical case study indicates that the proposed ensemble in this paper exhibits higher predictive accuracy along with better flexibility and comprehensiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.