ArticleInternal medicine (Tokyo, Japan)2025
Intravenous Verapamil for the Management of Atrial Fibrillation: The Gap Between the Guidelines and Clinical Practice.
Article in Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective According to the current guidelines, the use of non-dihydropyridine calcium-channel blockers for the rate control of atrial fibrillation (AF) is contraindicated in patients with heart failure (HF), especially in those with a reduced ejection fraction (EF). However, there is little data supporting this recommendation. This study aimed to investigate the use of intravenous verapamil in patients with AF. Methods We retrospectively studied 223 consecutive patients with AF treated with intravenous verapamil. We evaluated the clinical data of these patients, including any adverse events that occurred within 7 days. Results The median age of the patients was 75.9 (67.8-80.7) years. Before administration, 71 patients (31.8%) had HF, 112 patients (62.6%) had a high B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) level, and 28 patients (13.6%) had a left ventricular (LV) EF less than 50%. The mean administered dose of verapamil was 5.4±1.6 mg. The median heart rate (HR) was significantly reduced after verapamil administration [HR:145 (130-160) bpm to 95 (82-105) bpm, p<0.001]. Twenty-eight patients (12.6%) suffered from hypotension. Two patients had bradyarrhythmias. Within 7 days, cardiovascular death occurred in three patients (1.3%). A multivariate analysis revealed that pre sBP and hemoglobin, but not LVEF or BNP, were independently associated with adverse events. Conclusion The intravenous administration of verapamil appears to be effective and safe for controlling the heart rate in most patients with AF, except in critically ill patients. However, further research is required to assess the safety of verapamil in patients for whom its use is not currently recommended by the clinical guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.