ArticleThe Journal of veterinary medical science2025
Possible correlation of specific bacteria detected by using a novel screening method and periodontal disease in dogs.
Article in The Journal of veterinary medical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bridging the gap:Gut microbes · 2026Review
- Characterization of the Oral Microbiome and Anticipated Functional Profiles of Companion Animals in Private and Cohabiting Environments: A Pilot Study.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Subgingival Bacteria in Canines With Periodontal Disease.Veterinary medicine international · 2026Article
- Microbial therapeutics for canine periodontal disease: current status and future perspectives.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study sought to create a simple method for screening and detecting oral bacteria associated with periodontal disease as well as to identify the bacterial species that had the strongest correlation with disease severity in dogs. Fifty-two dogs from the Kagoshima University Veterinary Teaching Hospital were included. The periodontal disease status, which included gingival recession, root surface exposure, and gingival redness, was determined through visual examination. Oral swab samples were taken from each dog's gingival margin or tooth cervix using a sterile cotton swab following a standardized protocol. The collected samples were applied to our nanotechnology named sugar chain immobilized magnetized gold nanoparticle/magnetic microparticle (SGNP/MMP) method to obtain bacterial DNA, which was then subjected to qualitative and semiquantitative PCR analyses for 6 genera and 8 species of bacteria: Porphyromonas gingivalis (P. gingivalis), Tannerella forsythia (T. forsythia), Treponema denticola (T. denticola), Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans (A. actinomycetemcomitans), Fusobacterium nucleatum (F. nucleatum), Prevotella intermedia (P. intermedia), Porphyromonas gulae (P. gulae), and Porphyromonas cangingivalis (P. cangingivalis). The severity of periodontal disease was most strongly correlated with T. denticola (associated with the gingival recession), followed by slight total bacteria and P. gingivalis+P. gulae, but no significant correlation was found with P. gulae. Within the scope of this study, the analytical method used may represent a useful standard for screening and detecting specific bacteria, and the quantity of T. denticola is linked to the severity of periodontal disease in dogs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.