ArticleEuropean journal of heart failure2025
Prediction and prognostic role of left ventricular systolic dysfunction in family screening for dilated cardiomyopathy and non-dilated left ventricular cardiomyopathy.
Article in European journal of heart failure, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Non-Dilated Left Ventricular Cardiomyopathy: Exploring the Spectrum from Phenotype to Disease Entity.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Study design and rationale of the Visualizing Subclinical Myocardial Changes with Shear Wave Elastography in Dilated Cardiomyopathy (VISUALIZE-DCM) trial.European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2026Article
- Titin Cardiomyopathy, Emerging Evidence: More Than A Big Heart.Current cardiology reports · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsThe prognostic significance of detecting left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction during family screening programmes (FSPs) in relatives of probands affected by dilated (DCM) and non-dilated left ventricular (NDLVC) cardiomyopathies remain unclear. This study sought to evaluate the prognostic role of LV systolic dysfunction detection in relatives of DCM/NDLVC probands and to define the most accurate FSP. METHODS AND
resultsBaseline and follow-up data of first-degree relatives of probands affected by DCM/NDLVC were collected. The primary outcome was all-cause death and heart transplantation. Secondary heart failure (HF) and arrhythmic outcomes were also included. A total of 492 first degree relatives were enrolled. During a median follow-up of 110 months (interquartile range 57-188 months), only subjects that previously developed LV systolic dysfunction had primary outcomes (19 vs. 0, p < 0.001) and secondary outcomes (HF: 12 vs. 0, p = 0.005; arrhythmic: 30 vs. 0, p < 0.001). Subjects with LV systolic dysfunction detected by FSP showed lower rate of primary outcomes (FSP: n = 19 [14%]; no-FSP: n = 40 [37%]; p < 0.001) and secondary arrhythmic outcomes (FSP: n = 18 [13%]; no-FSP: n = 41 [38%]; p < 0.001). In this setting, family history of arrhythmia and being carrier of a pathogenic/likely pathogenic variant are the main risk factors for LV systolic dysfunction, while LV global longitudinal strain (LV-GLS) and Holter electrocardiogram (ECG) showed a relevant role in terms of prediction of LV systolic dysfunction and outcomes.
conclusionsRelatives of DCM/NDLVC probands who developed LV systolic dysfunction during a long follow-up had a significant increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular outcomes. However, LV systolic dysfunction detected by FSP showed a better prognosis. In this context, genetics, Holter ECG and LV-GLS demonstrated their functional role for disease and event prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.