ReviewAdvances in kidney disease and health2025
Acute Kidney Injury Care Following Hospitalization: Care Provision and Public Policy for Acute Kidney Injury Survivors.
Review in Advances in kidney disease and health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Multi-omics analysis revealsFrontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The global incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) is increasing. AKI is associated with both short- and long-term risks, including increased risk of chronic kidney disease and kidney failure, cardiovascular events, and all-cause death. This review summarizes existing posthospitalization AKI care guidelines, interprets the current state of evidence for AKI survivor care models including nephrology-specific and multidisciplinary team interventions, and details the health policy landscape for AKI survivors receiving outpatient dialysis in the United States. The main finding of this review is that evidence supporting specific posthospitalization AKI care interventions is very limited, resulting in imprecise consensus-based practice recommendations by national and international kidney societies for AKI survivors. The main implication of this work is to highlight the urgent need for additional research evaluating the efficacy of different care models among AKI survivors at high risk of maintenance dialysis, progression of kidney disease, rehospitalization, and death to devise value-based care models and clinical interventions that improve patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.