ArticleBone & joint open2025
The Inaugural UK National Hallux Valgus Think Tank : identification of key issues and strategies to improve clinical care for patient benefit.
Article in Bone & joint open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Aims: Hallux valgus (also known as a bunion) is a common forefoot deformity impacting pain, function, quality of life, and mobility, with higher prevalence in females and increasing incidence with age. The high prevalence and rates of surgical treatment potentially have a major impact on the healthcare system. The aim of this stakeholder consultation was to identify current issues with provision of hallux valgus treatment, as well as identify achievable goals to improve understanding of hallux valgus and guide future assessment, treatment pathways, and research directions with the aim of improving clinical outcomes for patients. Methods: Scoping searches were undertaken to inform and identify relevant outcome sets and existing evidence relating to hallux valgus. A one-day think tank conference was held on 21 June 2024, involving stakeholders from various sectors, including patients, primary and secondary care professionals, researchers, and representatives of national societies. Key themes and issues related to hallux valgus were identified and used to develop structured action development plans. Results: Major issues identified include the absence of national policy recommendations, variability in treatment pathways, and gaps in research and patient education. Patient experiences highlighted the significant impact on quality of life and the need for standardized information and care pathways. Key priorities for research include developing a core outcome set and understanding the patient's lived experience, while policy priorities focus on creating national guidelines and raising awareness of the condition's socioeconomic and functional impacts. Conclusion: The inaugural UK National Hallux Valgus Think Tank identified critical issues in the management of hallux valgus and developed strategies to improve clinical outcomes through research and policy development. Establishing a working group and prioritizing both research and policy initiatives will be essential to advancing the understanding and treatment of hallux valgus.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.