ArticleAsian spine journal2025
Carbon-fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone instrumentation in metastatic spine tumor surgery: technical considerations and potential pitfalls to avoid.
Article in Asian spine journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Carbon fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone implants versus titanium implants for spinal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Robot-Assisted Placement of Thoracic Carbon-Fiber-Reinforced Polyetheretherketone (CFR-Peek) Pedicle Screws in the Cervical Spine for Giant Cell Tumor: Technical Note.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Carbon-fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone (CFR-PEEK) instrumentation has been reported in recent years for metastatic spine tumor surgery (MSTS). The benefits of CFR-PEEK include imaging artifact reduction, which enables more efficient follow-up and adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) planning compared with traditional titanium implants. Despite the increase in CFR-PEEK application in the literature, technical guides or considerations in terms of CFR-PEEK usage in MSTS are currently unavailable. This study aimed to highlight various important technical considerations and potential pitfalls for surgeons when applying CFR-PEEK instrumentation in MSTS. This narrative review was conducted using PubMed, Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online, The Cochrane Library, and Scopus databases through December 31, 2024. This review included all studies related to CFR-PEEK instrumentation in MSTS. The vast personal experiences of the senior authors with the CFR-PEEK instrumentation circumstantiated the concepts emphasized in this paper. This review included 36 articles and discussed various considerations when planning for CFR-PEEK instrumentation in patients undergoing MSTS. Factors include preoperative construct planning, intraoperative CFR-PEEK system handling, and postoperative considerations such as the requirement for RT planning. This review is the first to highlight various considerations for MSTS surgeons when applying CFR-PEEK instrumentation. This serves as an important guide for surgeons performing MSTS, with the continuous evolution of our treatment capacity in metastatic spinal disease (Level of evidence: IV).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.