Trial reportJournal of hepatology2025
Five-year overall survival update from the HIMALAYA study of tremelimumab plus durvalumab in unresectable HCC.
Trial report in Journal of hepatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03298451 (A Randomized, Open-label, Multi-center Phase III Study of Durvalumab and Tremelimumab as First-line Treatment in Patients With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma), which is not on this map. Cited by 98 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomized, Open-label, Multi-center Phase III Study of Durvalumab and Tremelimumab as First-line Treatment in Patients With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Who cites it
98 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- A dual-level Bayesian network meta-analysis of first-line immunotherapy in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: strategy-level and regimen-level evidence.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Pooled it
- Locoregional therapy combined with targeted therapy and immunotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Scientific reports · 2025Pooled it
- T-Cell Receptor and Immune Gene Expression Pharmacodynamics for Durvalumab Alone and with Tremelimumab or Bevacizumab in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026Trial
- Cost-effectiveness of finotonlimab plus bevacizumab versus sorafenib as first-line therapy in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma in China.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2026Article
- Patient characteristics to guide personalized treatment decisions and prognostication in hepatocellular carcinoma.Hepatic oncology · 2026Review
- Stratifying Cardiovascular Risk in Patients With HCC Receiving Atezolizumab/Bevacizumab: A Comparison of ESC and CARDIOSOR Scores.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2026Article
- Systemic treatment paradigms for unresectable and advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in Europe.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2026Review
- Response evaluation to systemic therapy in HCC: Current challenges and future perspectives.Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.) · 2026Review
- NKG2A-HLA-E axis contributes to an immunosuppressive checkpoint network in hepatocellular carcinoma.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2026Article
- Review
- Survival in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: Comparison of four treatments based on patients reconstructed from Kaplan-Meier curves of randomized trials.World journal of gastrointestinal pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026Article
- Hepatology: Emerging Paradigms in MASLD, Viral Hepatitis, Cholestatic Liver Disease, Portal Hypertension and Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Summary of the First Annual Paris International Liver Meeting 2026.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2026Review
- Prognostic Usefulness of Clinical Complete Response after PD-1 Inhibitor-Based Combination Therapy for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma (GUIDANCE006).Liver cancer · 2026Article
- A multicenter pilot study of nivolumab with drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization in patients with liver-limited hepatocellular carcinoma.ESMO gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Article
- Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Atezolizumab-Bevacizumab and Durvalumab-Tremelimumab as First-Line Systemic Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Real-World Study.Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026Article
- Deep Response as a Novel Efficacy Endpoint in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Liver cancer · 2026Article
- Immunotherapy for Digestive System Cancers: Progress, Challenges, and Future Directions.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Review
- First-Line Durvalumab-Tremelimumab in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Real-World Data from Turkey.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Baseline DCP May Modify Response to Atezolizumab-Bevacizumab Versus Durvalumab-Tremelimumab in Unresectable HCC.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2026Article
38 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
27 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND &
aimsIn the phase III HIMALAYA study (NCT03298451), STRIDE (Single Tremelimumab Regular Interval Durvalumab) significantly improved overall survival (OS) vs. sorafenib in unresectable HCC and demonstrated long-term survival benefits. We report an updated exploratory analysis of OS after 5 years of follow-up, including survival by multiple tumour response measures.
methodsParticipants were randomised to STRIDE (tremelimumab plus durvalumab), durvalumab or sorafenib. OS, depth of response and serious adverse events were assessed. Extended long-term survivors (≥48 months beyond randomisation) were described. The updated data cut-off was 01 March 2024.
resultsMedian (95% CI) follow-up durations were 62.49 (59.47-64.79) months (STRIDE) and 59.86 (58.32-61.54) months (sorafenib). The OS hazard ratio (95% CI) for STRIDE vs. sorafenib was 0.76 (0.65-0.89). OS rates at 60 months for STRIDE vs. sorafenib were 19.6% vs. 9.4% overall, 28.7% vs. 12.7% in participants achieving disease control per RECIST v1.1, and 50.7% vs. 26.3% in participants achieving >25% tumour shrinkage. No late-onset treatment-related serious adverse events were reported for STRIDE. There were more extended long-term survivors with STRIDE (83/393, 21.1%) than sorafenib (45/389, 11.6%), and extended long-term survival occurred across all clinically relevant subgroups.
conclusionsAt 5 years, STRIDE sustained an OS benefit vs. sorafenib and maintained a manageable safety profile. OS benefit with STRIDE was improved in participants with disease control. Data suggest that any degree of tumour shrinkage with STRIDE can be associated with improved OS, indicating that conventional response measures may not fully capture the benefits of STRIDE. Nevertheless, participants experiencing deep responses appear to have the greatest benefit. STRIDE continues to set new benchmarks in unresectable HCC with 1 in 5 patients alive at 5 years. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: NCT03298451. IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS: The phase III HIMALAYA study showed that STRIDE (Single Tremelimumab Regular Interval Durvalumab) improved overall survival (OS) vs. sorafenib in participants with unresectable HCC, including after 4 years of follow-up. Understanding the efficacy and safety of STRIDE over the longer term is important for healthcare providers; here, we demonstrate that STRIDE sustained an OS benefit vs. sorafenib and maintained a manageable safety profile after 5 years of follow-up. OS benefit with STRIDE was improved in participants with disease control and any degree of tumour shrinkage, indicating that conventional response measures may not fully capture the benefits of STRIDE. These findings are important as they set new benchmarks in unresectable HCC and may help guide clinical decisions in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40222621What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.