ArticleInternational journal of medical informatics2025
Automated phenotyping of mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease and related dementias using electronic health records.
Article in International journal of medical informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Measuring mild cognitive impairment using routinely collected health-care data: A conceptual framework and guidance for embedded pragmatic clinical trials.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026Review
- The Brain Vulnerability Index: Development and Validation of a Machine Learning-Derived, Community-Informed Geospatial Risk Score for Cognitive Impairment.Research square · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
31 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesUnstructured and structured data in electronic health records (EHR) are a rich source of information for research and quality improvement studies. However, extracting accurate information from EHR is labor-intensive. Timely and accurate identification of patients with Alzheimer's Disease, related dementias (ADRD), or mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is critical for improving patient outcomes through early intervention, optimizing care plans, and reducing healthcare system burdens. Here we introduce an automated EHR phenotyping model to streamline this process and enable efficient identification of these conditions.
methodsWe analyzed data from 3,626 outpatients seen at two hospitals between February 2015 and June 2022. Through manual chart review, we established ground truth labels for the presence or absence of MCI/ADRD diagnoses. Our model combined three types of data: (1) unstructured clinical notes, from which we extracted single words, two-word phrases (bigrams), and three-word phrases (trigrams) as features, weighted using Term Frequency-Inverse Document Frequency (TF-IDF) to capture their relative importance, (2) International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes, and (3) medication prescriptions related to MCI/ADRD. We trained a regularized logistic regression model to predict MCI/ADRD diagnoses and evaluated its performance using standard metrics including area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC), area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC), accuracy, specificity, precision, recall, and F1 score.
resultsThirty percent of patients in the cohort carried diagnoses of MCI/ADRD based on manual review. When evaluated on a held-out test set, the best model using clinical notes, ICDs, and medications, achieved an AUROC of 0.98, an AUPRC of 0.98, an accuracy of 0.93, a sensitivity (recall) of 0.91, a specificity of 0.96, a precision of 0.96, and an F1 score of 0.93 The estimated overall accuracy for patients randomly selected from EHRs was 99.88%.
conclusionAutomated EHR phenotyping accurately identifies patients with MCI/ADRD based on clinical notes, ICD codes, and medication records. This approach holds potential for large-scale MCI/ADRD research utilizing EHR databases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.