ArticleJournal of evaluation in clinical practice2025
Monitoring Vital Signs With Continuous Monitoring After Major Gastrointestinal Surgical Procedures: The Patient, Nurse and Physician Perspective.
Article in Journal of evaluation in clinical practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- From perception to response: translational progress implementation challenges of wearable non-invasive continuous vital sign monitoring in early warning for inpatients.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Pooled it
- Wearable Electronic Monitoring of Vital Signs in Hospitalised Adults: A Nursing Focused Scoping Review of Clinical, Economic and Implementation Outcomes.Journal of advanced nursing · 2026Article
- Evaluation of off-the-shelf wearable for ambulatory clinical event monitoring and patient localization in hospital settings.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Accuracy of vital sign monitoring using a photoplethysmography upper arm wearable device in postoperative non-cardiac surgery patients: a prospective observational clinical validation study.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2026Observational
- Deep vein thrombosis and coagulopathy following cyclone events: pathophysiology, risk factors, and prevention.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPatients undergoing major abdominal surgical procedures are at risk of postoperative complications, requiring early recognition. Clinical deterioration is preceded by changes in vital sings, which are measured three times a day by a nurse. Due to the intermittent measuring, this may result in a delay in the recognition of clinical deterioration. Continuous vital sign monitoring through wireless sensors offers a potential solution for earlier recognition.
aimTo evaluate user satisfaction of a new wireless monitoring system measuring vital signs continuously, by both patients and healthcare providers.
designA prospective, questionnaire-based study.
methodsFrom December 2021 to November 2022, user experience questionnaires were administered to patients who underwent major abdominal surgical procedures and received the patch postoperatively. Questionnaires were administered as well to nurses and physicians working on a surgical ward with the patch. Continuous measurements of heart rate, respiratory rate, and temperature were taken using the Sensium wireless patch.
resultsA total of 298 respondents completed the questionnaire, 191 patients, 88 nurses, and 19 physicians. Of the patients, 69% had a positive experience with the patch, and 74% felt safer. Sixty-three percent of the nurses were positive, and 65% had the feeling that they could monitor the patients better this way. Of the physicians, 63% were positive, 32% believed clinical deterioration could be identified earlier.
conclusionThe use of the Sensium wireless patch for continuous monitoring of vital signs postoperatively was found to be feasible and well-tolerated. Patients, nurses, and physicians reported a positive experience with its use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.