ArticleEuropean journal of sport science2025
The effect of work rate on metabolic and mechanical intensity measures across skating style sub-techniques in cross-country skiing.
Article in European journal of sport science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to examine how the work rate (WR) influences whole-body metabolic rate (MR) and more local measures of intensity (i.e., pole power, joint power, and triceps brachii (TB) and vastus lateralis (VL) tissue saturation index (TSI)) across skating style sub-techniques in cross-country skiing (XCS). Five-minute efforts were performed at a range of submaximal speeds at constant inclines of 2% for G4, 5% for G3, and 12% for G2. Pole forces and 3D motion capture were used to calculate pole, elbow, and shoulder power. TSI in the TB and VL muscles was measured using near-infrared spectroscopy. There was a significant interaction effect of WR and sub-technique on MR (p < 0.001), with a steeper slope in G4 followed by G3 and G2. Similar interaction effects were evident for shoulder power (p < 0.001), but neither for elbow power (p = 0.512) nor for arm or leg tissue saturation (p = 0.766). Relative pole and arm power contributions were independent of WR but differed between sub-techniques. Both VL and TB had greater TSI in G4 (p = 0.025) and G3 (p < 0.001), respectively, compared to G2, and the triceps brachii had a ∼15 ± 7% (p < 0.001) greater TSI than the vastus lateralis across sub-techniques. Differences in WR-induced responses on various metabolic and mechanical responses across sub-techniques demonstrate the necessity of a more nuanced view on exercise load and intensity, especially on the local joint and muscle level, in XCS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.