Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40221982›Full record

Observational studyClinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis

The Standardized Prophylaxis and Risk Factors for Venous Thromboembolism in Patients of Respiratory Intensive Care Unit: A Retrospective Observational Study.

Bin-Yan Fu, Sheng-Xin Fan, Jia-Zhou Liu, Yu-Liang Liu, Xiao-Hui Wang, Hong Chen

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Bin-Yan FuDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Chongqing Medical University, No. 1 Youyi Road, Chongqing 400016, P. R. China.ORCID 0009-0009-3384-7738
Sheng-Xin FanDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Chongqing Medical University, No. 1 Youyi Road, Chongqing 400016, P. R. China.
Jia-Zhou LiuDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Chongqing Medical University, No. 1 Youyi Road, Chongqing 400016, P. R. China.
Yu-Liang LiuDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Chongqing Medical University, No. 1 Youyi Road, Chongqing 400016, P. R. China.
Xiao-Hui WangDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Chongqing Medical University, No. 1 Youyi Road, Chongqing 400016, P. R. China.
Hong ChenDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Chongqing Medical University, No. 1 Youyi Road, Chongqing 400016, P. R. China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BackgroundCritically ill patients in intensive care unit (ICU) are at high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). The standardized prophylaxis of VTE in these patients and the appropriate prevention protocols are not very clear.MethodWe enrolled 426 patients admitted to respiratory intensive care unit (RICU), all of them underwent Padua risk scoring and patients at high risk of VTE also underwent bleeding risk scoring. We compared the VTE prevention methods that followed the guidelines between two different bleeding risk groups and the VTE incidence of these two groups. We also analyzed the risk factors for VTE in RICU patients.ResultsIn patients admitted to RICU, the rate of overall VTE prophylaxis was 71.3% (295/414), but the rate of standardized prophylaxis of VTE was only 32.6% (135/414). The standardized prophylaxis rate of VTE in high-risk bleeding patients was 40.3%, much higher than the 22.2% in low-risk bleeding patients (

Indexed as

Respiratory Care UnitsVenous ThromboembolismAdultAgedFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesRisk Factorsanticoagulantsdeep venous thrombosispulmonary embolismthrombosis prophylaxisvenous thromboembolism

Identifiers

PMID40221982
PMCPMC12033453

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.