ArticleOdontology2025
Clinical efficacy of tunnel flap combined with de-epithelialized connective tissue graft in treating gingival recession: a case-series study.
Article in Odontology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To evaluate the clinical efficacy and influencing factors of the tunnel flap (TUN) combined with de-epithelialized connective tissue graft (DCTG) in the treatment of gingival recession (GR) from patient- and site-specific perspectives. Patients treated with the TUN + DCTG technique for GR between August 2020 and December 2023 were included. Baseline and follow-up periodontal measurements were recorded, including gingival recession depth (GRD), keratinized gingival width (KGW), and clinical attachment loss (CAL). Paired sample t-test was performed to assess the clinical efficacy. Moreover, primary outcome metrics, such as complete root coverage rate (CRC), mean root coverage rate (MRC), root coverage esthetic score (RES), and patient satisfaction, were calculated. Patient- and site-specific influencing factors were analyzed using a generalized linear mixed model regression (GLMM). A total of 34 patients with 201 affected teeth were included, comprising 78 cases of Cairo RT1, 86 of RT2, and 37 of RT3. Significant clinical improvements were observed over an average follow-up of 11.97 ± 4.11 months, including reductions in GRD (from 2.13 ± 1.14 mm to 0.48 ± 0.73 mm, P < 0.001) and CAL (from 3.22 ± 1.16 mm to 1.64 ± 0.90 mm, P < 0.001) and increases in KGW (from 2.58 ± 1.28 mm to 3.72 ± 1.66 mm, P < 0.001), with a CRC of 59.2% and MRC of 77.26% ± 33.48%. The mean RES was 8.21 ± 1.74, with 83.3% of patients reporting an improved quality of life. GLMM identified recession type, age, and tooth arch as predictable factors for clinical outcomes (P < 0.001). Within its limitations, this study suggests that the TUN + DCTG technique is a promising approach for managing GR, yielding favorable clinical and aesthetic outcomes. Clinical decision-making for GR treatment should consider a range of influencing factors to optimize individualized patient care.Clinical relevance: The TUN + DCTG technique is a reliable and effective option for GR treatment, providing consistent clinical and aesthetic benefits. Understanding predictive factors enables clinicians to tailor treatment strategies, improving success rates and patient satisfaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40221952What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.