ArticleJournal of ultrasound2025
Medical students' knowledge towards ultrasound in Kurdistan region, Iraq: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Journal of ultrasound, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
POCUS has become an indispensable modality in clinical practice due to its real-time, non-invasive imaging and accessibility. On the contrary, despite the importance of ultrasound, training is significantly variable across medical education, thereby leaving gaps in competency among graduates. In light of the aforementioned fact, ultrasound training is increasingly part of medical curricula; however, practical exposure remains limited due to logistic barriers. This cross-sectional study assesses ultrasound knowledge among 213 medical students across six academic years in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq. Results show that 95.3% of the students know that ultrasound is applied outside obstetrics, hence showing a general comprehension of its area. However, 43.7% of students wrongly believe that exposure to ultrasound radiation is involved, whereas only 56.8% appropriately recognize clinical contraindications, identifying residual misunderstandings. Knowledge improved with advancing year of study. For instance, knowledge that ultrasound is non-radiative increased from 17.6% in students in their first year to 95% in those in the sixth year (p < 0.001). Similarly, the use of ultrasound gel is known to 54.1% of the students in the first year, with this number increasing to 100% in the sixth year of study (p < 0.001). The overall ratings of students' knowledge were: fair, 86.4%; good, 8.5%; and poor, 5.2%. These results also indicate that more comprehensive ultrasound education in terms of ensuring proficiency is necessary, and misconceptions have to be dispelled among future physicians. This study is the first study which conducted in Kurdistan region of Iraq, therefore we think that it is important to know the medical students then the medical education program related to sonography can be changed according to the result.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.