Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40221942›Full record

ArticleJournal of adolescence2025

The Relationship Between Internet Use, Achievement, and Persistence in Digital Tasks.

Francesca Borgonovi, Elodie Andrieu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of adolescence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Francesca BorgonoviSocial Research Institute, Institute of Education, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-6759-4515
Elodie AndrieuParis School of Economics, Paris, France.

Funding

Francesca Borgonovi received funding from the British Academy through its Global Professorship scheme.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAs technology progresses, individuals will be increasingly expected to solve digital tasks. At the same time, many worry that a high use of connected devices will reduce young people's ability to perform with accuracy long cognitively challenging tasks online.

methodsWe examine whether 15-year-old students' ability to accurately solve cognitively challenging digital tasks-and to maintain accuracy throughout the 2-h PISA low-stakes -reflects their frequency of internet use. We do so using data from 153,603 students from 27 countries who participated in the 2018 Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA).

resultsCompared to students with moderate levels of internet use, students who use the internet a lot and those who never use it (or use it very little), have lower baseline levels of accuracy in all key assessment domains (reading, mathematics and science). By contrast, students' use of the internet is not associated with how much accuracy declines over the 2-h assessment when students are required to solve mathematics and science tasks. In reading, students who use the internet a lot have lower declines in accuracy over the course of the 2-h assessment compared to students with medium levels of internet use who, in turn, have lower declines than students with low levels of internet use. Internet use is not associated with how carefully students respond to questions in the background questionnaire.

conclusionsWorries about internet use reducing young people's persistence appear unfounded. At the same time high levels of internet use are associated with low baseline accuracy.

Indexed as

Academic SuccessAchievementInternetInternet UseAdolescentFemaleHumansMaleStudentsSurveys and Questionnairesaccuracyinternet useperformance declinePISAsecondary‐school studentstask persistence

Identifiers

PMID40221942
PMCPMC12217420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.