ArticleJournal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society2025
The Influence of Cup Orientation on the Primary Fixation of a Hemispherical Cementless Acetabular Cup: A Cohort Based Finite Element Study.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cup orientation has been investigated in detail with respect to risk of dislocation, however, the impact on the primary fixation of cementless cups is poorly understood. The aim of this study was to assess the influence acetabular component orientation on the primary fixation of cementless acetabular cups using an in silico clinical trial framework. Finite element models of 57 implanted hemi-pelves were generated from CT scans of a cohort of end stage osteoarthritis patients. Each hemi-pelvis was implanted with the with cup orientations that bounded the Lewinnek safe zone (mechanical alignment +/-10 degrees) and an approximation of the extreme orientations reported in the literature (mechanical alignment +/-20 degrees). Bone strain immediately adjacent to the implant and micromotions (gap and shear micromotions) were used to assess primary fixation. Analysis was performed at the levels of the individual subjects and the entire cohort. There was minimal variation in all metrics within the Lewinnek safe zone. Micromotion, particularly inferior gaping, was more sensitive to cup orientation than peri-prosthetic bone strain, tending to increase with inclination angle. Both the peri-prosthetic bone strains and micromotions were moderately correlated to the average bone modulus. Individuals with low bone modulus were shown to be more sensitive to changes in cup orientation for both peri-prosthetic bone strains and micromotions both within and outside the Lewinnek safe zone. This suggests that assessing bone quality should be routinely incorporated into the planning process, particularly when considering cup orientations outside of the Lewinnek safe zone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.