Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40221827›Full record

ArticleJournal of psychiatric and mental health nursing2025

Prevention of Violence in an Acute Psychiatric Unit: Spanish Validation of the Brøset Violence Checklist and Assessment of Its Predictive Capacity for Physical Restraint.

Vera Arenas, Estibaliz Muñoz, Amaia Barroeta, Marisa Oreja, Urko Aguirre, Leire Erkoreka

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of psychiatric and mental health nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Vera ArenasDepartment of Psychiatry, Galdakao-Usansolo University Hospital Osakidetza Basque Health Service, Galdakao, Spain.
Estibaliz MuñozDepartment of Psychiatry, Galdakao-Usansolo University Hospital Osakidetza Basque Health Service, Galdakao, Spain.
Amaia BarroetaDepartment of Psychiatry, Galdakao-Usansolo University Hospital Osakidetza Basque Health Service, Galdakao, Spain.
Marisa OrejaDepartment of Psychiatry, Galdakao-Usansolo University Hospital Osakidetza Basque Health Service, Galdakao, Spain.
Urko AguirreResearch Unit, Galdakao-Usansolo University Hospital Osakidetza Basque Health Service, Galdakao, Spain.
Leire ErkorekaDepartment of Psychiatry, Galdakao-Usansolo University Hospital Osakidetza Basque Health Service, Galdakao, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9104-0694

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe management of violence and restrictive practices in acute mental health units poses a challenge for the design of clinical nursing protocols that combine the safety of professionals and the dignified care of patients. Many of the strategies aimed at reducing seclusion and restraint practices include the use of standardised risk assessment instruments, preferably conducted by the nursing staff. Among them, the Brøset Violence Checklist (BVC) is one of the most widely supported tools.

aimTo conduct the Spanish validation of the BVC and to explore its predictive validity for violence and for the use of restraint.

methodsProspective data from 115 patients consecutively admitted to an acute unit of a general university hospital were gathered to validate the instrument. The role of risk factors for violence such as gender, age, substance use or the involuntariness of the admission was analysed, both in relation to the BVC score and to the need for physical restraint in the short and middle term (72 h and 1 week).

resultsThe Spanish version of the BVC maintains its predictive validity for imminent violence and guarantees excellent inter-rater reliability among mental health nurses. The score in the first shift after admission is significantly associated with increased odds of restraint at 72 h (OR = 7.272), and age with decreased odds (OR = 0.903), with no significant effect of the rest of the variables. DISCUSSION: The BVC is a reliable tool that seems to capture the risk for violence intrinsic to other factors, such as the involuntariness of admission. Its role in the design of non-restraint policies is discussed. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: BVC is a useful and freely available instrument. Its Spanish version opens up its use in the fourth most widely spoken language.

Indexed as

ChecklistMental DisordersPsychiatric Department, HospitalRestraint, PhysicalViolenceAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesPsychiatric NursingPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsRisk Assessmentphysical restraintpsychiatric nursingrisk assessmentviolenceBroset violence checklist (BVC)

Identifiers

PMID40221827
PMCPMC12233052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.