ArticleHereditas2025
Integrated multi-omics analysis and machine learning refine molecular subtypes and clinical outcome for hepatocellular carcinoma.
Article in Hereditas, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- A dual granular balanced deep forest model for effective drug combination prediction.iScience · 2026Article
- Explainable artificial intelligence and ensemble learning for hepatocellular carcinoma classification: State of the art, performance, and clinical implications.World journal of hepatology · 2025Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The high morbidity and mortality of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) impose a substantial economic burden on patients' families and society, and the majority of HCC patients are detected at advanced stages and experience poor therapeutic outcomes, whereas early-stage patients exhibit the most favorable prognosis following radical treatment. In this study, we utilized a computational framework to integrate multi-omics data from HCC patients using the latest 10 different clustering algorithms, which were then employed a diverse set of 101 combinations derived from 10 different machine learning algorithms to develop a consensus machine learning-based signature (CMLBS). Using multi-omics consensus clustering, we distinguished two cancer subtypes (CSs) of HCC, and found that CS2 patients exhibited superior overall survival (OS) outcomes. In TCGA-LIHC, ICGC-LIRI, and multiple immunotherapy cohorts, low-CMLBS patients demonstrated favorable clinical outcomes and enhanced responsiveness to immunotherapy. Encouragingly, we observed that the high-CMLBS patients may exhibit increased sensitivity to Alpelisib, AZD7762, BMS-536,924, Carmustine, and GDC0810, whereas they may demonstrate reduced sensitivity to Axitinib, AZD6482, AZD8055, Entospletinib, GSK269962A, GSK1904529A, and GSK2606414, suggesting that CMLBS may contribute to the selection of chemotherapeutic agents for HCC patients. Therefore, in-depth examination of data from multi-omics data can provide valuable insights and contribute to the refinement of the molecular classification of HCC. In addition, the CMLBS model demonstrates potential as a screening tool for identifying HCC patients who may derive benefit from immunotherapy, and it possesses practical utility in the clinical management of HCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.