Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40221748›Full record

Trial reportJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2025

Hands-free Atalante exoskeleton in post-stroke gait and balance rehabilitation: a safety study.

Thierry Lejeune, Dijana Nuic, Stéphanie Dehem, Jean-Gabriel Previnaire, Céline Cuenot, Thierry Debugne, Jerome Kaps, Bérénice Paul, Vincent Pean, Sergi Sanz Perez and 3 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04694001 (Evaluation of the Use of the Atalante Exoskeleton in Patients Presenting an Hemiplegia Due to Cerebrovascular Accident), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04694001 nacompletednot on this map

Evaluation of the Use of the Atalante Exoskeleton in Patients Presenting an Hemiplegia Due to Cerebrovascular Accident

TypeinterventionalSponsorWandercraftRan2021 to 2022Enrolled40ConditionsStroke, Stroke, Acute, Stroke, Subacute, Chronic StrokeArmsUse of the Atalante exoskeleton
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Thierry Lejeune *Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Service d Médecine Physique et Réadaptation; Université catholique de Louvain, Secteur des Sciences de la Santé, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, NMSK, 1200, Avenue Hippocrate 10, Bruxelles, Belgium. thierry.lejeune@saintluc.uclouvain.be.ORCID 0000-0001-5741-7753
Dijana Nuic *Wandercraft, Paris, France.
Stéphanie DehemCliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Service d Médecine Physique et Réadaptation; Université catholique de Louvain, Secteur des Sciences de la Santé, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, NMSK, 1200, Avenue Hippocrate 10, Bruxelles, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-5487-2344
Jean-Gabriel PrevinaireCentre Jacques Calvé - Fondation Hopale, Berck-sur-mer, France.
Céline CuenotCentre Jacques Calvé - Fondation Hopale, Berck-sur-mer, France.
Thierry DebugneRehazenter, Luxembourg, Luxembourg.
Jerome KapsRehazenter, Luxembourg, Luxembourg.
Bérénice PaulHȏpital La Musse, Saint Sébastien de Morsent, Saint-Sébastien-de-Morsent, France.
Vincent PeanStatistical consultant, Etavigny, France.
Sergi Sanz PerezCentre de Médecine Physique et de Réadaptation de Pionsat, Pionsat, France.
Fanny JuhelCentre Mutualiste de Rééducation et Réadaptation Fonctionnelles Kerpape, Plomeur, France.
Soultana Tatsidou *Centre de Médecine Physique et de Réadaptation de Pionsat, Pionsat, France.
Jacques Kerdraon *Centre Mutualiste de Rééducation et Réadaptation Fonctionnelles Kerpape, Plomeur, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStroke often results in gait dysfunction, impairing daily activities and quality of life. Overground robotic exoskeletons hold promise for post-stroke rehabilitation. This study primarily aimed to assess the safety of hands-free Atalante exoskeleton training in post-stroke subjects, with a secondary aim to assess gait and balance.

methodsForty subjects (10.2 ± 12.1 months post-stroke) with gait dysfunction (Functional Ambulation Category [FAC] score ≤ 3) underwent five training sessions over three weeks with a hands-free exoskeleton (Atalante, Wandercraft, France). Safety, the primary outcome, was evaluated by the number and severity of adverse events (AEs), judged by an independent clinical evaluation committee (CEC). A usability test was performed during the fifth training session followed by the exoskeleton use questionnaire. Gait and balance were assessed pre/post-training via walking capacity score (FAC), gait speed by 10-meter walk test (10MWT), walked distance by 6-minute walk test (6MWT), and balance by Berg Balance Scale (BBS). Spasticity was assessed with the Modified Ashworth scale. Anxiety and depression were quantified using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Safety outcomes were analyzed using the Wilson, Lee and Dubin methods for proportions, and occurrence rates were computed. Within-group differences were compared using Wilcoxon, McNemar, and Friedman tests, with significance set at P < 0.05.

resultsThirty-one subjects completed the training sessions, while nine discontinued. The study reported two serious adverse events (SAE) (vertigo, dysarthria) and six AEs, with the CEC concluding that no SAE was linked to the device/study procedure. The average AE rate per session was 2.5 ± 1.4%, including four events possibly linked to the device/study procedure (knee pain [n = 1], skin lacerations [n = 3]), classified as negligible or minor by the CEC. A high proportion (82.6%) successfully completed the usability test and reported satisfaction (90%) on the exoskeleton use questionnaire. For gait and balance, favorable changes were observed in FAC, 10MWT, 6MWT, and BBS scores Post-training (p < 0.05, respectively). Spasticity, anxiety, and depression remained unchanged.

conclusionsThis study indicates that the hands-free Atalante exoskeleton is safe, feasible, and well-tolerated for gait and balance rehabilitation in post-stroke subjects, warranting larger randomized controlled trials to assess its efficacy.

trial registrationEvaluation of the Use of the Atalante Exoskeleton in Patients Presenting an Hemiplegia Due to Cerebrovascular Accident (INSPIRE) trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04694001, registered on 20201231).

Indexed as

Exoskeleton DeviceGait Disorders, NeurologicPostural BalanceStroke RehabilitationAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedStrokeTreatment OutcomeBalanceGaitHands-freeOverground exoskeletonRehabilitationSafetyStroke

Identifiers

PMID40221748
PMCPMC11992748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.