Observational studyWorld journal of surgical oncology2025
Donafenib versus sorafenib in triple therapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score-matched multicenter analysis.
Observational study in World journal of surgical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn recent years, triple therapy (molecular targeted agent + PD-1 inhibitor + transarterial therapy) has emerged as a promising strategy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC). However, the optimal molecular targeted agent choice within triple therapy remains unclear. Donafenib is currently the only targeted drug with superior survival benefits compared with sorafenib monotherapy. This study aimed to compare donafenib-based versus sorafenib-based triple therapy in patients with uHCC, providing preliminary evidence to guide molecular targeted agent selection in this emerging treatment paradigm.
methodsThis retrospective study enrolled 106 patients with initially uHCC who received triple therapy combining either donafenib or sorafenib with PD-1 inhibitors and transarterial therapies. A 1:2 nearest neighbour propensity score matching was used to minimize selection bias. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) based on Kaplan-Meier analysis. The secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), surgical conversion rate and adverse events (AEs). Statistical comparisons used Cox regression for survival data and chi-squared/ t-tests for other metrics, with p < 0.05 indicating significance.
resultsAfter matching, 30 patients received sorafenib-based triple therapy (Sor-P-T/H group) and 50 patients received donafenib-based triple therapy (Don-P-T/H group). Although the median OS was not attained, the Don-P-T/H regimen demonstrated a statistically significant survival advantage (HR = 0.317, P = 0.004). Moreover, the Don-P-T/H group demonstrated significantly higher median PFS (9.00 vs. 4.62 months, P = 0.005), ORR (64% vs. 40%, P = 0.037) and surgical conversion rate (26.0% vs. 3.3%, P = 0.01) compared to the Sor-P-T/H group. The two groups showed no notable difference in the overall severity of adverse events but the Don-P-T/H group demonstrated less liver impairment.
conclusionDonafenib may be more advantageous than sorafenib in triple therapy for patients with uHCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.