ArticleItalian journal of pediatrics2025
Predictive model for initial response to first-line treatment in children with infantile epileptic spasms syndrome.
Article in Italian journal of pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Treatment history as early indicators of short-term response to ACTH therapy in infantile epileptic spasms syndrome: a propensity score matching analysis.Neurological research and practice · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a machine learning model to predict prognostic outcomes in infantile epileptic spasms syndrome.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPrevious studies have suggested that factors such as the treatment interval and aetiology may influence the initial response rate to first-line treatment for infantile epileptic spasms syndrome (IESS). However, few children with IECSS have undergone clinically accessible tests to determine the aetiology.
methodsUsing a dataset from our previously published research, we constructed and tested a predictive model for the initial response to first-line treatment in children with IESS. Random sampling and 5-fold cross-validation were performed, with synthetic minority oversampling technique to correct data imbalance. Machine learning algorithms and evaluation metrics optimised model accuracy and efficacy.
resultsThis study included 532 children with IESS who had completed monotherapy first-line treatment, of whom 160 achieved an initial response. The model's accuracy, F1 score, and area under the curve (AUC) in the validation set were 0.7836 ± 0.0229 (ranging from 0.75167 to 0.80536), 0.7833 ± 0.0229 (ranging from 0.75145 to 0.80531), and 0.8516 ± 0.0165 (ranging from 0.82468 to 0.86936), respectively. Factors such as the age of seizure onset, age of spasm onset, lead time, MRI subtype, treatment choice, and age at treatment consistently ranked in the top six for importance in contributing to the model.
conclusionsThe study findings suggest that this model may help effectively predict the initial response to first-line treatment, supporting clinical decision-making for children with IESS. Key predictors such as the age of seizure onset and MRI subtype enable early, data-driven intervention strategies in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.