Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40221725›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2025

Mapping the use of artificial intelligence in medical education: a scoping review.

Erwin Hernando Hernández Rincón, Daniel Jimenez, Lizeth Alexandra Chavarro Aguilar, Juan Miguel Pérez Flórez, Álvaro Enrique Romero Tapia, Claudia Liliana Jaimes Peñuela

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. [Medical education and artificial intelligence: perspectives and ethical challenges].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2025
    Pooled it
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Erwin Hernando Hernández RincónDepartment of Family Medicine and Public Health, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de La Sabana, Campus del Puente del Común, Km. 7, Autopista Norte de Bogotá, Chía, Cundinamarca, Colombia. erwinhr@unisabana.edu.co.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7189-5863
Daniel JimenezFacultad de Medicina, Universidad de La Sabana, Campus del Puente del Común, Km. 7, Autopista Norte de Bogotá, Chía, Cundinamarca, Colombia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8628-8591
Lizeth Alexandra Chavarro AguilarFacultad de Medicina, Universidad de La Sabana, Campus del Puente del Común, Km. 7, Autopista Norte de Bogotá, Chía, Cundinamarca, Colombia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-2554-6741
Juan Miguel Pérez FlórezFacultad de Medicina, Universidad de La Sabana, Campus del Puente del Común, Km. 7, Autopista Norte de Bogotá, Chía, Cundinamarca, Colombia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-6073-7943
Álvaro Enrique Romero TapiaDepartment of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de La Sabana, Campus del Puente del Común, Km. 7, Autopista Norte de Bogotá, Chía, Cundinamarca, Colombia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0999-5417
Claudia Liliana Jaimes PeñuelaDepartment of Family Medicine and Public Health, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de La Sabana, Campus del Puente del Común, Km. 7, Autopista Norte de Bogotá, Chía, Cundinamarca, Colombia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5240-4942

Funding

Universidad de La Sabana MED-342-2023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare has transformed clinical practices and medical education, with technologies like diagnostic algorithms and clinical decision support increasingly incorporated into curricula. However, there is still a gap in preparing future physicians to use these technologies effectively and ethically.

objectiveThis scoping review maps the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in undergraduate medical education (UME), focusing on curriculum development, student competency enhancement, and institutional barriers to AI adoption. MATERIALS AND

methodsA comprehensive search in PubMed, Scopus, and BIREME included articles from 2019 onwards, limited to English and Spanish publications on AI in UME. Exclusions applied to studies focused on postgraduate education or non-medical fields. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis to identify patterns in AI curriculum development and implementation.

resultsA total of 34 studies were reviewed, representing diverse regions and methodologies, including cross-sectional studies, narrative reviews, and intervention studies. Findings revealed a lack of standardized AI curriculum frameworks and notable global discrepancies. Key elements such as ethical training, collaborative learning, and digital competence were identified as essential, with an emphasis on transversal skills that support AI as a tool rather than a standalone subject.

conclusionsThis review underscores the need for a standardized, adaptable AI curriculum in UME that prioritizes transversal skills, including digital competence and ethical awareness, to support AI's gradual integration. Embedding AI as a practical tool within interdisciplinary, patient-centered frameworks fosters a balanced approach to technology in healthcare. Further regional research is recommended to develop frameworks that align with cultural and educational needs, ensuring AI integration in UME promotes both technical and ethical competencies.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceCurriculumEducation, Medical, UndergraduateClinical CompetenceHumansArtificial intelligence (AI)Curriculum developmentEthical trainingExperiential learningMedical educationUndergraduate medical education (UME)

Identifiers

PMID40221725
PMCPMC11993958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.