ArticleBMC ecology and evolution2025
Macroevolutionary trends in Ceratosauria body size: insights of phylogenetic comparative methods.
Article in BMC ecology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evolutionary decoupling between cranial shape and size underlies divergent evolutionary pathways in Cretaceous apex and meso-predator theropods.Communications biology · 2026Article
- Southern hemisphere ceratosaurs evolved feeding mechanics paralleling those of Northern hemisphere tyrannosaurids.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Obligate faunivorous megatheropod size class patterns across the Jurassic-Cretaceous Periods.PeerJ · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patterns of body size evolution in dinosaurs are relevant for understanding the evolutionary trends that have shaped the disparity of phenotypes observed in the fossil record. In this sense, previous studies have suggested that Abelisauridae followed Cope´s rule and Noasauridae exhibited a phylogenetic trend towards decreasing body size. However, the absence of a comprehensive analysis including ecological, phylogenetic and socio-sexual factors make it necessary to reevaluate body size evolution in Ceretatosauria under a modern phylogenetic comparative approach. Therefore, we aimed to test whether body size evolved in Ceratosauria in accordance with Cope´s rule, evaluate what factors best explain differences in body size within Ceratosauria and examine what patterns of evolution rates, selection strength and constrain explain the diversification body size in Ceratosauria. Differences in body size were found between specialized taxa (= Late Cretaceous abelisaurids) and "generalized taxa" (= Outgroups + Noasauridae). This results suggested that the presence of a specialized feeding strategy in Late Cretaceous abelisaurids was associated with differences in body size, regardless of the phylogenetic topology and evolutionary model used. Additionally, the low levels of morphological disparity, low evolutionary rates for taxa with a specialist feeding behavior in Brownian motion model and the fossil record suggest that the evolution of body size in Late Cretaceous abelisaurids was constrained. The cursorial abilities suggested for abelisaurids joined with the specialized predation strategy could have constrained the increase in body size in Late Cretaceous abelisaurids after the extinction of carcharodontosaurids. On the other hand, Noasauridae exhibited a phylogenetic trend towards decreased body size, likely to avoid niche overlap with medium size theropods and minimize structural and maintenance cost while living in stressful environments and having a generalist diet. Understanding how the dynamics of dinosaur communities, such as competition and predator-prey interactions, operated in South America during the Late Cretaceous is crucial for reconstructing the evolutionary and ecological processes that shaped its unique faunal assemblage. Futures works should be focus on process-based community-evolution model and species distribution modeling to further understand the macroevolution dynamics of South America dinosaur community.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.