ArticleScientific reports2025
Initial experience with the novel modular robotic system Carina in urology: a prospective study on safety feasibility and surgical settings.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07632638 (Safety and Technical Evaluation of a Robotic Platform), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Safety and Technical Evaluation of a Robotic Platform (RonovoTM) in Elective Oncological Surgery: A Prospective, Single-Arm, Multi-Specialty Registry
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Novel multiport robotic systems versus da vinci multiport robotic system in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of surgical and oncological outcomes.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Preclinical evaluation of the newly developed carina platform in robotic-assisted proctectomy with porcine and cadaveric models.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Initial experience with the Carina™ platform for gasless transaxillary robotic thyroidectomy in papillary thyroid carcinoma: an early feasibility report.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Robotic surgery in healthcare: current challenges, technological advances, and global implementation prospects.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Review
- [Evaluation of the feasibility and safety of a Chinese developed modular surgical robotic system for robot-assisted pyeloplasty].Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences · 2025Article
- Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Buccal Mucosal Graft Ureteroplasty and Ureteral Reim-plantation for Repair of Complex Ureteral Strictures Using the Modular Carina™ System.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of UrologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Robot-assisted surgery has transformed urology, but widespread adoption remains limited by the high cost, complex setup, and rigid system design. This prospective single-center study evaluates the safety and efficacy of the novel modular Carina in 19 upper and lower urinary tract surgeries. All cases were completed robotically without conversion, with one major complication. For partial nephrectomy (PN), median operative time (OT) was 120 min with 50 mL estimated blood loss (EBL), including one off-clamp PN completed in 77 min (EBL: 50 mL). Pyeloplasty had a median OT of 105 min (EBL: 50 mL), while radical prostatectomy (RP) achieved a median OT of 150 min (EBL: 50 mL). Radical cystectomy was completed in 301 min without major complications, and an uncomplicated postoperative course. Median docking times were 5 and 8 min for upper and lower tract surgeries, with negative margins and preserved renal function in all PN, and social continence post-RP. The Carina system demonstrates procedural safety and feasibility in complex urological procedures. The modular design may enhance workflow and space utilization, suggesting the potential for promising tool and broader clinical applications. Further validation with larger sample sizes and long-term follow-up is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.