ArticleScientific reports2025
Landslide susceptibility assessment using lightweight dense residual network with emphasis on deep spatial features.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Landslides are among the geological disasters that frequently occur worldwide and significantly restrict the sustainable development of society. Therefore, it is of great practical significance to perform landslide susceptibility assessment. In addressing issues such as limited training samples, inadequate utilization of spatially effective features, and high computational costs associated with existing methods, we propose a landslide susceptibility assessment method (DS-DRN), which uses a lightweight dense residual network with emphasis on deep spatial features. To minimize computational costs, we design a depthwise separable residual module that optimizes traditional convolution on residual branches into depthwise separable convolution. Additionally, to prevent vanishing gradient and improve the reuse rate of landslide feature information, dense connections are employed to construct a deep feature extraction module. Finally, the output of the model is fed into the Softmax classifier for landslide susceptibility prediction. Taking Ya'an City in Sichuan Province as the study area, we compare the proposed DS-DRN method with three widely used deep learning methods: CNN, CPCNN-RF, and U-net. Evaluating model accuracy and performance, the DS-DRN method exhibits the highest prediction accuracy while also saving computational costs. Therefore, the proposed model can better fit the complex nonlinear relationship in landslide susceptibility, effectively mine deep spatial features, and address the high computational costs associated with complex networks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.