ArticleScientific reports2025
Propensity score analysis of high-dose rate brachytherapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and docetaxel in second-line advanced NSCLC treatment.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of combining high-dose-rate brachytherapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and docetaxel as second-line treatment for advanced NSCLC, given the poor prognosis after first-line therapy. We conducted a single-center, retrospective, propensity score-matched study comparing HDR brachytherapy plus ICIs and docetaxel (study group) versus ICIs plus docetaxel (control group) in patients with advanced NSCLC who progressed after prior treatment without known driver gene mutations or uninvestigated mutation status. After propensity score matching, 21 patients were included in each group. The study group had a higher ORR (42.9% vs. 28.6%). Median OS was 18.6 months for the study group and 12.8 months for the control group (HR 0.45, 95% CI 0.20-0.85, P = 0.042). Median PFS was 8.6 vs. 5.6 months (HR 0.29, 95% CI 0.15-0.55, P < 0.001). The DCR was higher in the study group (71.4% vs. 61.9%). Treatment-related AEs were manageable, with no significant increase in grade 3/4 toxicities in the study group. Results suggest that combining high-dose rate brachytherapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and docetaxel may improve survival and response rates in advanced NSCLC after first-line therapy. Prospective randomized trials are necessary to confirm these findings and validate the strategy's effectiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.