ArticleScientific reports2025
Double weighted k nearest neighbours for binary classification of high dimensional genomic data.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- TriFusion-PCGNet: A Hybrid Multi-Branch Deep Learning Network for Energy-Aware Normal/Abnormal Heart Sound Classification.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- From linear models to deep learning: statistical advances in genomic selection for animal breeding.Journal of animal science and biotechnology · 2026Review
- DTF-STCANet: A Dual Time-Frequency Swin Transformer and ConvNeXt Attention Network for Heart Sound Classification.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
High dimensional gene expression datasets consist of a large number of genes, many of which do not play a significant role in classifying tissue samples. The high dimensional nature of this type of data, characterized by a large number of gene features substantially exceeding its sample size, makes it challenging for existing methods to work efficiently in terms of prediction accuracy and execution time. To address this issue, a new classification procedure called double weighted k nearest neighbours ([Formula: see text]) is proposed. [Formula: see text] is specifically designed for gene expression data and incorporates feature weights derived from genes' ability to express deferentially between classes. Features weights are derived in a manner that automatically increase the impact of informative features while decreasing it for features that are less/non informative. To achieve this goal, the estimated weighted distances from the observations in the k nearest neighbourhood to the test point are used in an exponential function. The outputs of the function are summed for both the classes separately and the test point is assigned the class label with the largest sum. By utilizing the proposed weighting method based on the differential capability of genes, the [Formula: see text] method aims to achieve robust and efficient classification by allowing only the most informative features/genes to contribute to the classification task. Experimental evaluations, in comparison with several methods, i.e., standard [Formula: see text], weighted k nearest neighbours classifier ([Formula: see text]), random k nearest neighbour ([Formula: see text]), extended neighbourhood rule ensemble (ExNRule), k conditional nearest neighbour ([Formula: see text]), [Formula: see text] ensemble and support vector machines (SVM), demonstrate the effectiveness of [Formula: see text] in accurately classifying gene expression datasets. Overall, [Formula: see text] presents a promising approach for gene expression data analysis through the two fold weighted distance calculation strategy using classification accuracy, Cohen's kappa, sensitivity and [Formula: see text]score as performance metrics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.