ReviewHuman cell2025
The influence of cell source on the senescence of human mesenchymal stem/stromal cells.
Review in Human cell, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Environmental Carcinogenesis as a Stochastic Evolutionary Failure of Senescence-Control Systems.Cells · 2026Review
- Donor age and sex program MSC secretome signaling: a quadrant framework for precision therapy.Stem cell research & therapy · 2026Article
- Mesenchymal stem cell senescence as a potency brake: causes, consequences, and cures.Frontiers in aging · 2026Review
- Exploring the therapeutic potential of MSC-derived secretomes in neonatal care: focus on BPD and NEC.Stem cell research & therapy · 2025Review
- Senescence of dental pulp stem cells: phenotypes, underlying mechanisms and regulatory molecules.Human cell · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSCs) exhibit the ability to self-renew, they are not immortal; they eventually reach a point of irreversible growth cessation and functional deterioration following a limited series of population doublings, referred to as replicative senescence. When evaluated according to the criteria set by the International Society for Cell Therapy (ISCT), MSCs show significant differences in their senescence patterns and other characteristics related to their phenotype and function. These differences are attributed to the source of the MSCs and the conditions in which they are grown. MSCs derived from fetal or adult sources have variations in their genome stability, as well as in the expression and epigenetic profile of the cells, which in turn affects their secretome. Understanding the key factors of MSC senescence based on cell source can help to develop effective strategies for regulating senescence and improving the therapeutic potential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40221541What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.