Trial reportArchives of dermatological research2025
A split face study comparing intralesional tranexamic acid versus 1064 nm long pulsed Nd: YAG laser for acne vulgaris treatment.
Trial report in Archives of dermatological research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acne is among most prevalent skin conditions that adversely impacts patients' quality of life and self-confidence. Conventional treatment methods face issues with high recurrence rates and unwanted side effects, prompting the need to explore new acceptable treatment options. Comparing the safety and clinical efficacy of intralesional tranexamic acid (TXA) versus 1064 nm long pulsed Nd:YAG laser in the treatment of facial inflammatory acne vulgaris. 30 patients with facial acne vulgaris were involved in a prospective randomized split-face comparative study. Each patient was treated with long-pulsed Nd: YAG laser on one side, and intralesional TXA on the other side at 2-week interval for 4 sessions. Cases were assessed through Investigator Global Assessment of acne (IGA) scale, lesions counting, and erythema score at baseline, after end of treatment, and after follow-up for 3 months. A statistically significant reduction in IGA, lesions count, and erythema score was found in both treated sides (p-value < 0.001). Improvement of IGA and non-inflammatory lesions count was better in laser side more than TXA side after end of treatment and follow-up (p-value < 0.05). Improvement of inflammatory lesions count was non-significant in both sides after end of treatment, while after follow-up it was better on laser side. Improvement of erythema score was non-significant between both therapy modalities after end of treatment and follow-up. 1064 nm long-pulsed Nd: YAG laser and intralesional TXA are effective, and safe treatment modalities for acne. However, Nd-YAG laser has prolonged therapeutic effect over intralesional TXA so, TXA can be considered a promising lunch-time procedure enhancing the outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40221536What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.